Posted on 03/16/2019 12:36:05 PM PDT by ransomnote
Can I take my ‘non-violent’ but well-sharpened pitchfork?
yes, it was noted above to/for me, he did recuse (or was recused) - that doesn’t concern me much, though, for, like Sessions, he/they need(s) to be recused so he/then can take on the bad guys without any claimed taint. That is/was the first time I’ve seen mention that I recall that he was personally interviewed by POTUS, clearly indicating the sensitivity & importance of the post.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is more garbage reporting. As Blu indicated, means NOTHING.
President-elect Trump interviewed lots of people. It was SMART. Many were real losers, e.g., Romney, Corker.
It was a great way to learn what he was up against, and partially defang some of them.
wow...no backups anywhere ?
You might enjoy my #1510. :)
I had a thought today ... I don’t think people will go this far ... but work with me lol:
There was this letter from ]SESSIONS[ that came out with e-mail from Whitaker last Friday night as I recall. Lib blogger type that somehow was apparently tipped at the time it was sent filed FOIA that same day. Then, just a week ago, as Whitaker left the building, voila! It was sent on over. DS media was outraged to learn that ]SESSIONS[ had tasked HUBER with CF + HRC e-mails, etc..
There were a couple words or clauses in the letter or e-mail that caught my eye this time.
One was that Whitaker / ]SESSIONS[ said something like ... you (HUBER) don’t have to look at anything that the Mule is already doing.
I’ve seen tangential stuff along the way here that suggests that the D_J is running like the Mule org (vs. op) represents some SIGNIFICANT portion of D_J business these days - like it’s the primary game in town. This has struck me that there’s more going on here than meets the eye and thus I flip & flop over [RR] & the Mule, etc..
I inferred from this e-mail / letter dump that HUBER wasn’t precluded from looking things under Mule jurisdiction.
BUT what if HUBER is providing some additional redirection that shields the Mule is doing things supposedly tasked to HUBER but ... and this necessitates the Mule & [RR] be more than leveraged IMO - the Mule is doing stuff that would not only substantiate the “ultimate reveal” I have in my wildest conceptualizations ... but kinda include something like a con within a con within a con ... so intertwined & obscured, there is practically NOBODY who really knows.
Whatever ... this is going to be glorious!
Darn Fine Job! The finish line is just ahead. Thanks for all your efforts.
HEAD’S UP: Hannity is replaying on FNC now if (like me) you mist the first time around except for the web links above :)
TYPO / AUTO-”CORRECT” - Mist = MISSED
Busy saving humanity.
Q
I think you are on to something there. I suspected the auto pilot software from the start; then I thought about the union and employee uproar about building a new Boeing plant in South Carolina, a right to work state. The 0bama Admin legally tried to block it.
Then there is the vigorous EU competition with its Airbus. Billions of dollars...
Will you be here all week? *ba-de-bump-bump*
As we’ve now passed ZEROCOOL [-0] ... remember this:
https://twitter.com/davenyviii/status/960603633137209344?lang=en
TrumpSoldier
@DaveNYviii
President Trump: We Caught ‘Em!
“Did we catch them in the act or what? You know what I’m talking about. Oh did we catch them in the act! They are very embarrassed. They never thought they were going to be caught. We caught ‘em... It’s so much fun. We’re like the great sleuth.”
I still want to know:
1) Who’s the great sleuth?
2) Who’s the witch?
3) Can [JB] get a Khalid Shekih Mohammed mug shot, please?
WWG1WGA :)
Well of course you can! I'll be bringing my bodyguards, Smith and Wesson. Peacefully, of course!
Ambassadors of which countries?
If this pans out, then Katie bar the door ..
Our ambassadors. Meadows did not indicate who as of yet.
On HANNITY: Sara Carter refers to “5 buckets” of types of things that are being unearthed & something to the effect that they’re finding stuff all over, related / unrelated, and that there’s lot of stuff to be done. She then says that this is the reason they tried to fix the election, etc., was to cover up all this other criminality. Have you ever heard anything like this before (”Q”).
HOWEVER then Hannity says that what he’s hearing is that there will soon be CRIMINAL REFERRALS (presumably coming out of IG) and *then* indictments LATER. Not even a tick tock!
I’m reminded that there are other IG’s in the picture here ... do IG’s in other departments still go through the D_J for prosecutions?
PS - some night last week Sean had Sara on and he was talking all over her and she has something prescient to report and she actually butted in and got to report what she’d come on there to say. It was a confirmation that viewers are not the only ones who are driven nuts by that lol ;)
Aren't some of those on Q's list ambassadors?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.