To: MNDude
We haven’t received any mixed signals about the Mule from Q at any point. Only that if RR is dirty, so is the Mule, and if RR is clean, so is the Mule.
152 posted on
03/11/2019 5:40:52 PM PDT by
Defiant
(I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
To: Defiant
We haven’t received any mixed signals about the Mule from Q at any point. Only that if RR is dirty, so is the Mule, and if RR is clean, so is the Mule.
That could be disinformation.
184 posted on
03/11/2019 6:17:08 PM PDT by
smileyface
(Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
To: Defiant
Only that if RR is dirty, so is the Mule, and if RR is clean, so is the Mule.
Actually "Q" said if RR is dirty, so is the Mule, and if the Mule is dirty, then so is RR.
The inverse is certainly inferred, in fact I did/had for some time - but they're not exactly the same. TBD ;)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson