LOL
Only a mental defective Qtard would try imply both are on the same page and in direct agreement.
LOL
Consistently wrong Qtard.As wrong as trying to argue U.S. Attorney`s regularly indict persons outside of their District.If that were normal as Qtards attempt to insist then L Linn Wood should have filed in the 8th N.Dist in Cedar Rapid,Iowa.
Provide docket evidence US Attorney Huber indicts outside of his District regularly.
Provide evidence pizza gate is factual.
Provide evidence POTUS has missiles shot at him.
All I did was put up the full context of their comments instead of the snippets you provided.
You're simply making an assertion, nothing more.
A grand jury indicts and a U.S. Attorney prosecutes based upon their indictment.
9-2.000 - Authority Of The U.S. Attorney In Criminal Division Matters/Prior Approvals
9-2.030 - Authorizing Prosecution
The United States Attorney is authorized to initiate prosecution by filing a complaint, requesting an indictment from the grand jury, and when permitted by law, by filing an information in any case which, in his or her judgment, warrants such action, other than those instances enumerated in JM 9-2.120.
As you can see, a United States Attorney, outside of a grand jury, starts the process by first filing a complaint.
I believe you blurred the lines there a little bit.
Just in case you take exception to the "Criminal Division" aspect...
Types of Juries
Grand Jury
A grand jury is presented with evidence from the U.S. attorney, the prosecutor in federal criminal cases. The grand jury determines whether there is “probable cause” to believe the individual has committed a crime and should be put on trial. If the grand jury determines there is enough evidence, an indictment will be issued against the defendant.
Once again, a U.S. attorney doesn't indict anybody, a grand jury does that.