No ... I didnt see it posted earlier.
Likely others are in the same boat.
It was posted (Q 2912) at the end of the old thread and again at the beginning of this new Q thread?
https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/02/27/facebook-insider-leaks-docs/
Insider, Formerly Responsible for Content Review in Facebooks Intellectual Property Dept Speaks Out, Loses Job Facebook Engineers Plan to demote bad content Conservative Facebook Page Livestreams Secretly deboosted, No Notice to Page Owners Facebook Can Classify Users as Trolls Based on Their Vocabulary, Then Punish By Limiting Bandwidth, Blocking Comments Facebook Engineer: hateful content is coming from right-leaning sites. Special features Triggered leading up to important elections Bizarre View of hate speech Includes Content from Conservative Commentator
(San Francisco) Project Veritas has obtained and published documents and presentation materials from a former Facebook insider. This information describes how Facebook engineers plan and go about policing political speech. Screenshots from a Facebook workstation show the specific technical actions taken against political figures, as well as [e]xisting strategies taken to combat political speech
The insider believes Yamamotos plans appears to be political in nature, rather than in response to abusive behaviors, [i]t was clearly kind of designed aimed to be the right wing meme culture thats become extremely prevalent in the past few years. And some of the words that appeared on there were, using words like SJW MSM the New York Times doesnt talk about the MSM. The independent conservative outlets are using that language.
Also in Yamamotos report was a line appearing to say that online Facebook trolls are involved in destructive behaviors such as [r]ed-pilling normies to convert them to their worldview.
In online circles the term red-pilling refers to bluntly showing the truth, and normies refers generally to apolitical or uninformed people.
Other actions that could be interpreted as bad content could be posting words such as zucced, REEE, and normie. Said the insider, Facebook is shifting the goal post. Its one thing, if youre dropping the n-word, or things like that, using some kind of homophobic or racial slur, by all means thats something that a platform should not want on it. But now youre moving it to things like, jokes that conservatives tend to make.
Special features triggered leading up to important elections
Two of the tactics outlined in the presentation that the Facebook engineers propose for dealing with troll operations involve the introduction of a Troll Twilight Zone. Yamamoto and de la Rubias presentation says that troll accounts, can have their internet bandwidth limited and experience forced glitches like frequent auto-logout[s] and the failed upload of comments. These special features would be triggered leading up to important elections. Facebook could identify trolls by their vocabulary, friend network, and behavior, according to the presentation. Facebook has whats called a Fake Account Index, explained the insider, where they assign a score which helps them determine whether the account is a real person or just a dummy spam account. And rightfully so, they want to delete those accounts, thats okay. They created the troll score so they could help identify, using words they would post, pictures, if they were friends with other trolls and then using that to determine whether this person should be on the platform or not.
The troll score...
If a Q post was made 11 hours ago, I guarantee you that it was posted and discussed here 10.5 hours ago. No need to repost it.