I must have missed the Q post letting us know NOBODY could be the news, unless they were a a bona fide QResearch Anon. Or even just Anon to pass it along.
Or that we shouldn't touch or use their stuff without rigorous attribution? Or despite clear invitation, we shouldn't browse and help ourselves to their Memes and art and vetted info?
Isn't it assumed by now, for a small example, that unless I declare otherwise, that everything I bring over here, came from them? (I do declare it's from them, enough to be tedious, sometimes.)
If you could provide me sauce for that particular Q guidance, then I suppose I would have to consider quitting this effort and taking my energy elsewhere.
But I don't buy it. You guys by yourselves are great and all, but there are not nearly enough of you to get the job Q tells us we should be doing, done. Somehow, being a bona-fide Anon outside of QRsearch at this point, seems a bit past it's "best by" date.
I'm mildly anon when posting here as EasySt, but not at all when trying to bring my family along for the ride with The News! Success results in THEM being the News. I don't tell them they have to be anon.
You guys got the plane in the air with your heavy lifting, but now that Q is speaking to the Nation and the World, as much, if not more than to QResearch Anons, I'm thinking that except for that vehemently free environment, the usefulness of strict anonymity out here is becoming reduced.
Over here, we would love for the normies to hear from us.
(Who has no clue about this note being dared to publish, and is wondering if he's pissed someone off.)