^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Well, I'm saying Q does SPECIFY the way--and it's NSA.
NSA has always been the agency responsible for "Cleaners" who deal with the rogue agents in all other agencies.
Btw, I'm absolutely unimpressed with arguments that begin with "Most anons" ... "most scientists" ... "most observers" etc.
My experience is that "Most" are wrong, most of the time.
Let me just say that “I” disagree with your interpretation, irrespective of what most anons, or most climate scientists say. However, in spite of your disregard of the credibility of the collective “most anons”, if most anons have come up with an interpretation of a Q post that makes a lot of sense, I do consider it when forming my own opinion. You can ignore them if you wish.
If the efforts to make the system work through prosecution and release of classified information fails, the NSA doesn’t have a mechanism to sweep in and save the day. It is a repository of information and geeks. The US military has its own geeks, but it has significantly more firepower.
Since Q does not specify what [Except 1] means in the recent drop, one man’s guess or considered opinion is as good as another.
Maybe we’ll find out eventually; maybe not. If the follow-the-laws way works, we won’t have to find out. That’s what I hope.