Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kallisti

Geezer brain freeze: what does CLAS 1-99 signify?
_______________________

I’m in the freezer with you. I am wondering if it might be pages 1-99 of a classified document.

I suspect that the text in that drop (dialogue between Barr/Mueller and Barr/RR is a paraphrase, for brevity and confidentiality concerns, of Barr getting these two men on the official record (accountability) explaining the actions they undertook which can get them fired AND prosecuted.

Given the stakes, I don’t believe Barr would meet with RR and Mueller in private (one-on-one), I believe the men would have their lawyers present, that they did not have an option not to answer, and that Mueller knew Barr had adequate documentation to refute any attempt made to deny the truth (we don’t see RR’s response), so Mueller gave what would seem to be disastrous (for him) answers to Barr’s questions.

For example, “Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing,” is not written in the language needed for prosecution and/or firing, so I believe this is a form of deposition or closed hearing and Barr worked through the lengthy interview format needed for the official record and the text was distilled down to the sentence in the drop.

Note that RR does not answer these (paraphrased for us) clear, direct questions. When Barr asks, “justify why you did this,” RR basically responds, “We didn’t find anything.” Disastrous answer by RR, one I believe he would only give if he had no alternatives (Barr, et. al. have it all).
~~~~
“Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between Pres...” Again, this terse, telegraphic format doesn’t seem like the language of prosecution (not quoting the official transcript) but instead, a Cliff’s notes version (shout out to bagster) for public consumption.

Mueller’s disastrous response: “Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.” I believe if Mueller had ANYTHING else he could have said in response, he certainly would have, or that he would decline to answer if he could, and that he never would give THIS response unless forced (legally) to go on record.
~~~~
“Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?” Of course, Barr knew the answer already, and as they say, prosecution never asks a question of a WITNESS (that’s the tone of this paraphrased dialogue - official testimony or deposition of Mueller) unless the prosecution already knows the answer.

I believe “on record” much groundwork was laid establishing the fact it was not trusted and verified (that’s partly why I think Clas 1-99 means “classified pages 1-99, this whole dialogue would have been padded with much legal fortification, presentation of exhibits and necessary verbiage).
~~~
“Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” (ransomnote: This is a fall-outta-your-chair bad answer, given the stakes, yet I believe it was phrased by an attorney to be repeated by Mueller) “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.” These were the best answers Mueller could give!!?? - Barr DOES has it all.
~~~~
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed....” More “concrete balloon” answers Mueller grips tightly as he sinks...

~~~
It took me awhile to write all this - if I click “post” now, I will probably discover other, better answers have already been provided by three separate FReeQs, two Anons and a few Tweeters and maybe 7 - 10 new Q drops....but if I bail out now I’ll end up writing small portions of this again to some other post in the next few days.
*sigh*
*click*


1,123 posted on 02/17/2019 10:05:39 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1099 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

G’morn and thanks for your sharing your initial thoughts on this odd Q post (odd because I do not grok).

One passage I get hung up on:

Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”

Negated to populate fully? Like the requestors didn’t have the time to fill out the FISA sections for veracity of source? It must be the wrong night to give up bourbon or else I’m very confused.

I keep going back to the intent of this Q post.

A search of Q posts for “CLAS” led me to 1/21 #570:

Will SESSIONS drop the hammer?
1 of 22.
#Memo shifts narrative.
#Memo reinstates SESSIONS’ authority re: Russia/ALL.
#Memo factually demonstrates collusion at highest levels.
#Memo factually demonstrates HUSSEIN ADMIN weaponized INTEL community to ensure D victory [+insurance].
#Memo factually demonstrates ‘knowingly false intel’ provided to FISA Judges to obtain warrant(s).
THEY NEVER THOUGHT SHE WOULD LOSE.
[The 16 Year Plan To Destroy America]
Hussein [8]
Install rogue_ops
Leak C-intel/Mil assets
Cut funding to Mil
Command away from generals
Launch ‘good guy’ takedown (internal remove) - Valerie Jarrett (sniffer)
SAP sell-off
Snowden open source Prism/Keyscore (catastrophic to US Mil v. bad actors (WW) +Clowns/-No Such Agency)
Target/weaken conservative base (IRS/MSM)
Open border (flood illegals: D win) ISIS/MS13 fund/install (fear, targeting/removal, domestic-assets etc.)
Blind-eye NK [nuke build]
[Clas-1, 2, 3]
Blind-eye Iran [fund and supply]
Blind-eye [CLAS 23-41]
Stage SC [AS [187]]
U1 fund/supply IRAN/NK [+reduce US capacity]
KILL NASA (prevent space domination/allow bad actors to take down MIL SATs/WW secure comms/install WMDs) - RISK OF EMP SPACE ORIG (HELPLESS)
[CLAS 1-99]
HRC [8] WWIII [death & weapons real/WAR FAKE & CONTROLLED][population growth control/pocket billions]
Eliminate final rogue_ops within Gov’t/MIL
KILL economy [starve/need/enslave]
Open borders
Revise Constitution
Ban sale of firearms (2nd amen removal)
Install ‘on team’ SC justices> legal win(s) across spectrum of challengers (AS 187)
Removal of electoral college [pop vote ^easier manipulation/illegal votes/Soros machines]
Limit/remove funding of MIL
Closure of US MIL installations WW [Germany 1st]
Destruction of opposing MSM/other news outlets (censoring), CLAS 1-59
[]
Pure EVIL.
Narrative intercept [4am].
Sessions/Nunes Russian OPS.
Repub distortion of facts to remove Mueller.[POTUS free pass].
Shutdown Primary Reasons.
Distract.
Weaken military assets.
Inc illegal votes.
Black voters abandoning.
“Keep them starved”
“Keep them blind”
“Keep them stupid”
HRC March 13, 2013 [intercept].
The Great Awakening.
Fight, Fight, Fight.
Q

Is CLAS a list of charges?


1,148 posted on 02/17/2019 10:44:13 PM PST by kallisti (Loosen up and have some fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson