I had a structural geology professor in the mid 1970s who was opposed to plate tectonics from his viewpoint all orogenic activity, i.e. mountain building could be explained by geosynclines. Being a geophysics major was a “rough course” for me!
Wow. He must have been tenured.
How else could you teach personal
hogwash and stay employed?
I have a curious and respectful question. Do you remember what the current acceptable 100 year “sink rate” is? Only asking because I would like to make a historical building comparison that might baffle some.