To: carriage_hill
This article is stupid. It claims the forest fires in California are caused by pollution.
8 posted on
02/03/2019 6:11:00 AM PST by
for-q-clinton
(This article needs a fact checked)
To: for-q-clinton
This article is stupid. It claims the forest fires in California are caused by pollution. Inverting cause and effect is a classic ruse of advanced propaganda.
By doing so, you can make societal norms seem absurd and mad.
There's a guy at the NYT who every year or so writes an article under a headline that's some variation of this: "Incarceration Rates Increase Even Though Crime Remains At Historic Low".
19 posted on
02/03/2019 6:45:22 AM PST by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: for-q-clinton
"This article is stupid. It claims the forest fires in California are caused by pollution.”
True that. In every scene in "Blade Runner" it's friggin rainin. Like it was in Seattle and not L.A.
27 posted on
02/03/2019 7:25:21 AM PST by
RedMonqey
("Those who turn their arms in for plowshares will be doing the plowing for those who didn't.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson