If a women donated eggs to an egg bank and some other sterile woman chose to take that egg and have implanted would you say that the egg donor woman Had abandoned the child and should be taken out behind the barn and shot
Simple fact men donate sperm and women donate eggs.. In the past it was for couples where the man or the woman was sterile that would take advantage of these services
unfortunately now it's single women exploiting these services but you don't hold them responsible.
Yet it's the same women there make it all the choices but you don't hold them a response at all
In logic, to say that A did such and such and therefore should be treated in such a way, is entirely unrelated to what B, C, and D did, and how they should be treated.
I made no comments on B, C, and D and any speculation is, well, speculative.
Men who do not take care of the children they father should be taken out and shot. Men who walk away from the children they father with their sperm should be taken out and shot.
I have not commented on mothers, doctors, the state, sisters, brothers, politicians.
Man + Woman, PIV intercourse, with the Man and Woman being married and staying married, supplies something the child has a natural right to: a full-fledged double-constellation of natural kinship ties, a secure natural identity, and a secure mom-day environment to grow up in. That corresponds to what the child needs.
No other system does.
Sometimes, God knows, this pattern breaks down in a no-fault way. Dad dies, mom dies, both die, whatever. Then others have to step in to supply what they can, as well as they can. As in adoption.
But it's wrong to intentionally bring a child into being, into a preplanned broken situation. As in these morally defective gametes-for-sale schemes.
Don't "harvest" eggs and sperm for commercial transactions. Men, women: don't sell gametes for reproduction.