That is the crux of the issue - I can understand when a married couple (male + female, the only legitimate kind of marriage) has fertility issues - like the prospective father is sterile, pursuing sperm donation, though adoption would be a far more God-glorifying and society-helpful avenue to children.
But when single women or homosexuals decide to circumvent God’s pattern and purpose - they are sinning and I have zero sympathy for that person and there rebellion.
As to the child - I see no legal obstacle to her seeking knowledge of her donor father once she is of the age of “majority” - but mom signed a contract and then tried to break it.
Sperm "donating" (actually *vending*) involves a guy masturbating into a baggie while looking at porn, and then selling his couple milileters of semen to be inserted up the genital tract of a woman he doesn't know, guaranteeing his ability to walk away from any responsibility for the child he sires, and getting paid for it.
How is this jerkoff-based, dehumanized, depersonalized, commercial sex-related transaction OK for an infertile male-female couple to get involved in?
Does this couple have a right to acquire a baby by, despite or against nature, "by hook or by crook", just because they're a couple?
How is this part of "God's pattern and purpose"?
I don't get your reasoning here.