Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

During the time of the evac, he was a reserve just about to get into training active duty. As a rifleman, he would have been considered a direct tactical combat asset. But I understand what you are saying, and you’re right. But not with him with the enlistment and discharge dates.

rwood


29 posted on 01/27/2019 9:45:27 AM PST by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Redwood71

Yeah, I didn’t see any reference to the Saigon embassy needing any reefer fixing during that time frame.


30 posted on 01/27/2019 9:47:17 AM PST by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Redwood71

Every Marine (even my MOS 6682) is considered a “basic qualified infantry rifleman”. That is most likely why we had to use Navy Corpsman and Chaplains.
The evacuation of Saigon was in 1975 and I was in Iwakuni, Japan. We did have to do some “expedited work” not long after that for VMCJ-2 (a photo recon squadron) after the Cambodians hijacked the Mayaguez


36 posted on 01/27/2019 12:07:17 PM PST by 68stanger (If you are interested in time travel, meet me last Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson