Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Defiant

thanks for your response to post 33....

“Once declass happens, grand jury material might be more susceptible to becoming public, but it appears that the motion involves something else,...”

see post #297 and #313 and what do you think??


319 posted on 01/26/2019 1:16:38 PM PST by bitt (forget the electric chair..we're gonna need electric bleachers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: bitt

Well, here’s what we know:

It involves a grand jury subpoena directed at a company and a country. The order that the subpoena is enforceable was appealed directly to the Supreme Court.

Whoever filed the motion in the lower court, a prosecuting entity of some kind, asked to file the motion paperwork under seal. The Supreme Court granted that request. The US Solicitor General, on behalf of the United States, filed a motion stating that the US does not believe that the papers need to be redacted.

What we can surmise:

The only entity out there that could be doing this filing and not be speaking for the USA is Mueller’s Special Counsel. So, Mueller is subpoening a company and a foreign country, and the subjects of that are fighting back.

What is conjecture: Could be Ecuador and Wikileaks, could be Russia and some Russian company, could be Deutsche Bank and Germany, could be Trump’s Russian entity and Russia about the Moscow Trump Tower proposal, could be some hacker from the Balkans and his home country, could be something else. We know it is not Britain and Steele’s company, because Mueller has no interest whatsoever in proving his own investigation is illegal.


334 posted on 01/26/2019 1:44:34 PM PST by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson