Posted on 01/13/2019 11:31:29 PM PST by ransomnote
Schiff-for-brains’ arrogance & bluster have deluded him that he can grand stand and pontificate his way out of prison and possible execution for crimes against minors & against humanity. Obviously whatever crap is between his ears is saturated in globalist Kool-Aid.
“Pelosi Galore” - KeK!
<< “FAKE SQUARED” >>
Laughing out loud, meyer. Perfect Phrase!
I read the article - no he’s not a ‘fan’ but at least he has some ideas other than “Q is a LARP I thought we already settled that.”
I think I heard this too somewhere... Fitton?
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said Tuesday the House will cancel its scheduled recess next week unless the partial government shutdown ends and the government is funded.
“If the government is not open, we will not have a recess,”
***************
So the House of Representatives can operate normally without “security”, but cannot host the State of the Union Address, because of concerns for “security”.
The public needs to flood Dems with calls for them to build the wall, since security is an issure.
Steve King EXPOSED the globalist RINOS, eliciting their UN-American over-the-top REACTION.
I can NOT stand McCarthy. His election to the Speaker post was Not a good sign for leadership. He needs the boot.
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3720413/posts?page=1
Dhimmicrats did not want to have to produce a living, breathing Ginsburg for the address.
Yes! IRISH! Same difference. .)
Did not want to…..or can’t?
However, given all their container ships; all the soldiers they could put on them . . . I think it might be tempting to underestimate China.
Then there is their DEEP rooted Chinese pride and resolve to MAKE CERTAIN this is the CHINESE CENTURY, if not Millennia. They really believe it IS 'their turn' to rule the world and that America is falling like Rome.
NBC, CNN: Secret Service, DHS Reject Nancy Pelosi’s ‘Security’ Excuse for Canceling State of the Union
China has one big worry right next door.
Japan
Well, with Germans you cain’t tell until they’ve up and made you surrender (if your French).
Hey! Do you know why Napoleon planted Linden trees along the Champs d’Elysse?
Note 2: for TL/DR crowd: "White Nationalism" must always be denounced as evil. Anyone not following this rule is evil themselves. Steve King broke this rule and is being punished.
Greeneyes wrote:
To me a Nationalist is some one who believes in borders and national Sovereignty - a Patriot. And adding the term White or black to turn it into a pejorative is racist. And that is what the left is doing.
The terms 'white nationalist' and 'black nationalist' have been in common use for decades and have clear meanings. Perhaps you are not familiar with them, but it is incorrect to claim that "the Left" is modifying these terms to turn them into pejorative or racist terms.
The term 'nationalist' is generic, and it's almost always has an adjective applied in front of it like "Russian nationalist" "French nationalist. Nationalism, after all, is the preference for the particular over the universal. Most people today contrast "nationalism" with "globalism". Nationalist almost requires a further adjective to make it complete.
I learned about Black Nationalism in the 1960s in high school where I had a black English teacher who was a self-described Black Nationalist. The online dictionary says:
"advocacy of or support for unity and political self-determination for black people, especially in the form of a separate black nation."
There is a Wikipedia article on Black Nationalism, and it traces the origin of the movement back to the 1800s and the inspiration of the "successful" Haitian revolution. Jumping ahead we learn:
...(the) modern form of black nationalism that stressed the need to separate blacks from non-blacks and build separate communities that would promote racial pride and collectivize resources.The new ideology became the philosophy of groups like the Moorish Science Temple and the Nation of Islam. By 1930, Wallace Fard Muhammad had founded the Nation of Islam. His method to spread information about the Nation of Islam used unconventional tactics to recruit individuals in Detroit, Michigan.
Later on, Elijah Muhammad would lead the Nation of Islam and become a mentor to people like Malcolm X.[6] Although the 1960s brought a period of heightened religious, cultural and political nationalism, it was black nationalism that would lead the promotion of Afrocentrism.
So, Black Nationalism is simply a descriptive term for a political philosophy that is over 100 years old.
Lots of leftists describe themselves as "Black Nationalist" and suffer no consequences for doing so, including my high school English teacher in the early 1970s. It's not that controversial, and certainly every Black Studies professor is very familiar with the term and free to use it in describing certain people or movements.
White Nationalism, however, has been turned into a pejorative. This is similar to the way "black pride" is universally viewed as a great thing, public schools are very concerned with inculcating "black pride" in black students, whereas "white pride" is considered evil, and a racist concept by large swaths of people (All liberals and many conservativess)
This is a double standard, obviously. But it's still defacto what these terms mean.
Suprisingly (because it's relatively neutral) the Wikipedia article for White Nationalism has this introduction:
White nationalism is a type of nationalism or pan-nationalism which espouses the belief that white people are a race[1] and seeks to develop and maintain a white national identity.In everyday common usage, and in politics, it's way simpler:Its proponents identify with and are attached to the concept of a white nation. White nationalists say they seek to ensure the survival of the white race, and the cultures of traditionally white ethnic groups. They hold that white people should maintain their majority in majority-white countries, maintain their political and economic dominance, and that their cultures should be foremost.
Many white nationalists believe that miscegenation, multiculturalism, immigration of nonwhites and low birth rates among whites are threatening the white race, and some believe these things are being promoted as part of an attempted white genocide.
Steve King failed to adhere to the Prevailing Orthodoxy on this, and is being publicly flogged for it.
Other examples of public figures failing to vigorously condemn White Nationalism are Trump's famous first comments on the Charlottsville riots:
“I think there is blame on both sides,” the president told reporters that day in August 2017.Trump was eventually forced to restate his position after days of withering criticism by upholders of the Prevailing Orthodoxy - which says: all examples of or references to White Nationalism must be condemned vociferously.“You had some very bad people in that group," Trump said, referring to the white nationalist groups rallying against removal of a Confederate statue. "But you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides.”
Steve King didn't do this. He may yet lose his seat over it.
Dhimmicrats did not want to have to produce a living, breathing Ginsburg for the address.
************
Invite the Supreme Court members, invite the Speaker of the House, Invite the President of the Senate.
Hold the State of the Union Address in the Oval Office, or the Senate.
Then see if Ginsburg and the others show up.
:: Note: Jack Black posting now featuring soy-colored text! ::
Just when I thought we had seen the weakest Foo from Whitey Bread...
I posted this Epoch Times by Brian Cates yesterday, in entirety, same exact topic and very well summarized for red-pilling anyone.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3719723/posts?page=790#790
The Real Reason Democrats Won’t Budge on Border Security
https://www.theepochtimes.com/__trashed-438_2767150.html
Woo FReeQing Hoo!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.