Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steven W.
she needn’t be present for oral arguments, etc., etc., etc. This is a travesty of justice.

But surely she can't render an opinion? Seems to me that Justice Kav had to hurry up and be seated before a case was heard in order to vote on it?

1,951 posted on 01/07/2019 11:14:27 AM PST by blu (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1849 | View Replies ]


To: blu

Kavanaugh is not expected to rule on the cases he missed. Only one of them has a doubtful outcome.


1,953 posted on 01/07/2019 11:17:36 AM PST by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1951 | View Replies ]

To: blu

I guess reasoning is that since RBG is already on the court and laws don’t apply to liberals... yeah a travesty or rape as I was corrected of justice


2,013 posted on 01/07/2019 12:20:33 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1951 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson