Q Anon: 01/04/19 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 01/04/19 | FReepers, vanity

[LonePalm]

I found a picture of Jacky Soy's watch.

I believe it is a good bit more accurate than he is.

WWG1WGA

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

[haffast]

“””I thought of this guy when I saw your meme. :) “””

Man! His first day on the job with CPS and those sacks were addressed wrong so he had to go back and pick them up. ;)

[defconw]

The longer this goes on, the more I realize, I love this guy! #NoHomo, for FReepers who may think I’m a guy!

[defconw]

Dude, I have been in since October of 2017. I have read every bread. Been all over VOAT. Watched just about every QAnon video there is. STILL don’t understand the damn clock!

[Unrepentant VN Vet]

.

[Bob Ireland]

***Can anyone cite where any previous SCJ has been able to decide argued cases on the basis of transcripts of testimony?***

After RBG criticized Prez Trump she should have recused herself from any decisions concerning him - essentially forcing her retirement. Just recently the Dems (the people who run this country) demanded that Justice Kavanaugh recuse himself.

In their (Dems) minds you and I are speaking about that ancient republic that once existed on the North American continent.

[bitt]

I used to post Sundance posts to the forum every day - now, I’ve dropped him, he’s dead to me. :)

BUT let’s pretend he’s part of Q’s disinfo campaign...yeah, that’s the ticket.

[bagster]

I found a picture of Jacky Soy's watch.

Haha.

A soi dial.

And the tech is hundreds of years behind, just like JD.

Bagster

[jjotto]

Chief Justice Rehnquist voted and wrote opinions while at home and not present for oral arguments.

[Steven W.]

All they had to do was have Fusion GPS send Marina to Cruz HQ instead of Trump Tower; their scams are one size fits all .. and therein I’ve wondered if they may have blown it - by using the likes of Halper, they have + used known sources and methods - should make connecting the dots easier for the white hats.

[Steven W.]

believe it is a good bit more accurate than he is.

—— that depends on where one is standing lol ;)

[LonePalm]

—— that depends on where one is standing lol ;)

Last I heard, Jacky was outstanding in his field. There was a fire in the bathroom but they got it before it spread to the house.

WWG1WGA

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

[Steven W.]

Has Trump specifically said that tomorrow speech is all / only border? A DECLAS announcement instead would be master trolling! Do the EO for border next week after 12/21 EO’s

[defconw]

I think you are def on the right track.

[ransomnote]

MoD: Back in November 2018, I was baffled by the following Q drop. 

 

~~~~~ 

 

2497

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI20 Nov 2018 - 8:41:59 PM

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1065100343846031362📁
FBI - 3
DOJ - 1
People are nervous.
Q

 

~~~~~

 

MoD: I didn't know to whom Maggie Haberman  was addressing her comment. I was startled to see a NYT "Mockingbird" (a.k.a "journalist") publicly acknowledging Q. I'll put an image of the Maggie's linked Tweet below:

~~~~~

 

~~~~~

MoD: Tonight I found a Tweet from Q Analyst "Storm is Upon Us" (Author of "We are The Plan" video in our thread table) which decodes her tweet, and which I will put below:

~~~~~

~~~~~

MoD: StormIsUponUs explains that Maggie's Tweet was directed at fellow deep staters posting question on 8ch in (fearful) hopes of finding out who's next, what's going to happen, what are Q/POTUS planning for the deep state. Maggie is telling them (does she supervise 8ch shills from her Twitter Account?) not to bother trying to get Q to reveal what's habbening next. 

Note: Maggie's Twitter feed has alot of fun Q army puns and some memes which were being gleefully stolen by many, prompting one Anon to remark, "What we steal one, we steal all!"

There are other Q drops regarding Haberman; I'll put a jaw-dropper below. I remember thinking it was red meat before, but had forgotten it. Before you read it, recall that according to Wikipedia, Haberman does have 3 children.

~~~~~

1221

Q!xowAT4Z3VQ21 Apr 2018 - 9:56:16 AM

Right on Q.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/987724899614674944
Hello Maggie.
Trust funds (3).
Deposits routed from EU.
Why are deposits ORIG from EU being transferred into [3] TRUST funds [children]?
How do you get your talking points?
Why do many DC journalists (yourself) use & replace 'burner phones' every week?
How do you pass the new number out?
Tweets are very important.
Do you feel safe?
Q

 

~~~~~

 

MoD: Maggie Haberman sold her country out for children's trust funds?! And of course, her own professional prestige. Looking over her "credits" she's heavily praised/privileged; there's an article title that reads, "If You Want To Understand What Donald Trump is Thinking, Read Maggie Haberman."

 

Lastly, she gets her 4am talking points from DMs (direct messages) on Twitter, and also is able to share/receive "burner phone" numbers that way. As Q says, "We have it all."

 

I just thought I would pass it along in case anyone else was confused as I was.

[Yulee]

Thank you.

[Bob Ireland]

***the chance that Trump might announce building the wall without congress***

For my part I doubt POTUS will announce his decision to build the wall. He has already said he wanted to wait for a SCOTUS decision on DACA. Also, he would lose his leverage over Poorlosi and Scheemer... they are on the hot seat now.

I suspect he just wants to present his case to the American people, the case against criminals, drugs, human and child sex trafficking, MS13, terrorism, etc. We will see. 😐

[little jeremiah]

***Chief Justice John Roberts announced that Justice Ginsberg would be deciding the argued cases “on the basis of the briefs and transcripts of oral arguments.”***

So can “regular” judges make their decisions from home just reading some notes?

This is so WRONG.

[little jeremiah]

Very clear, thank you.

[Melian]

...from her refrigerator..
.........

Love ya, blu! Lol