^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Actually, no.
I guess I can see how you might interpret my answer that way; but, I do not recall ever objecting to persons interpreting the Bible as applicable to current events.
I know there are others who may feel that way, or who simply prefer to leave out the Bible altogether ... but that is not me.
My objection is to "endorsing" (by placing at the top of the thread) additional non-Q third-party (i.e., non-FReeQ) sources. Personally, I would stop at praying medic if any.
I don't know if you have noticed, but in my prior posts I also object to pasting the Q posts with non-Q "Titles" that come from some aggregator sites.
Of course, no one else seems to be bothered by this, so I post my criticism and move on.
No outside comms.
Thanks, dis’. I concur emphatically. Always nice to have my own strong opinion validated, by someone whose intelligence is superior to my own.
I’m rigid on Q comms because Q is rigid on comms, and has repeatedly made that crystal clear. Personally speaking, there’s also the Q Clock running, with no time on it for rabbit holes or conjecture on them, of their dimensions and directions.
I mean, “We have it all”, and, “ You have more than you know”. ( Presuming there is no infiltration and misdirection, coming from elsewhere.”) Besides, it’s Show Time, according to Q, and not new code drops, , new interpretations, new anything, until Q drops phase Show Time.
Q hasn’t done that.