Posted on 12/24/2018 9:54:40 PM PST by conservative98
Let Me Be Frank - Kevin Spacey
Hes being Frank the character.
He was playing his character, southern politician Frank Underwood in House of Cards.
Frank Underwood is from Gaffney, South Carolina.
About to go on trial on Nantucket in MA for sexually abusing the teen son of a local TV anchor.May not get away with it.
He did a voice in animated film Secret Life of Pets.Someone else will do the character in sequel.
he should have impersonated his “Usual Suspects” character instead.
House of Cards character.
Weirdo. There was nothing in the cup by the way
I’m thinking this dude needs to take his ass back to K-PAX.
I love that scene. Crazy Alec Baldwin was awesome too
...Let Me Be Frank - Kevin Spacey...
As they say, “Shirley you jest “
He’s too creepy.
I, too, thought it might have been produced by Netflix. If not, he’s taking a risk at them suing him over the use of the character.
“Let me do Frank”
Wow.
I watched Mr. Show but clearly blocked that bit out.
But that he'd release it himself at this time is really bizarre.
“What if it was produced by Netflix?”
—
_THAT_ wouldn’t surprise me at all. Netflix used to be good , with a larger variety of movies and TV shows, but now it’s 99% just sludge. I don’t have have the time nor the inclination to dig through the sludge in hope of finding aa gem.
But I guess re: Spacey - if you’re on your way out, going out the nutso way is as good as any, I suppose.
Bottom line is this:
If Netflix is not on board with this, they’d better release a statement within 24 hours on the matter.
Because no one did really see him die.
Because the ending really was awful for what was a somewhat decent show (understanding the plot of course).
In that video, he basically highjacked the character to make his point. There have been a number of men who got barbecued by this “me too” thing only to skate later.
We’ll see.
Merry Christmas, Everyone.
If only he had waited just a few more years for LGTB to finish normalizing P
I would stipulate that you should use the accurate term, homoeroticism, rather than the inaccurate term, homosexuality.
To use the latter implicitly gives it a patina of legitimacy before any argument is made; there is no such thing as a functional sexuality between two persons of the same sex.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.