The subject of the investigators never interviewing key witnesses keeps coming up. If they “have it all”, why would interviews be necessary? Seems to me that the less contact with those waiting to be indicted, the better.
>If they “have it all”, why would interviews be necessary?
I feel so terminally clueless. Like reading a Russian novel and not being able to follow the plot. Just when I think I’ve got an inkling what’s happening, another subplot sends me off in another direction.