PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMIS
Despite having help from a large team of lawyers with drafting their Memo. (p. 46), the Defendants’ initial pleadings in this case are dripping with the same types of misinformation and false pleadings that plagued the allegations from their Dodgy Dossier reports that they helped to introduce in the FISC. No lawsuit by the pro se Plaintiff has ever been “dismissed with prejudice”ii (Id., p. 14). Dr. Page was never “a public figure” (Id., p. 12) until the Defendants and their subcontractors worked vigorously behind the scenes to maliciously communicate their false Dodgy Dossier allegations to countless journalists. Compl. ¶ 19.I have no idea how he will do on this lawsuit, but the fact that he's filed it in Oklahoma is great.The Defendants’ long list of misinformation has thus far continued indefinitely. The Defendants’ actions against the Plaintiff that were initiated in April 2016 (Compl. Exhibit 1) and resultant illegal offenses have reflected a complete disdain for the integrity of the U.S. justice system. While the countless incorrect factual allegations and prolix legal text in their Memo. follows this same trend that corrupted the integrity of the FISC, the preliminary details presented in this short response provides the Court with a brief summary of an alternative proposed initial framework for future proceedings in this civil action based instead on accurate facts and applicable legal principles.
Good luck to you, Dr. Carter Page.
Breaking News on twitter...1 hour ago
JUST IN: In a speech to soldiers in Iraq, President Trump says he has no plans to withdraw troops from the country; “If we see something happening with ISIS that we don’t like, we can hit them so fast and so hard they really won’t know what the hell happened.”