Posted on 12/21/2018 10:16:29 PM PST by ransomnote
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Here's the thing about market punditry: At any given moment exactly 50% of the money thinks one thing, and the other 50% thinks the opposite.
If this were not so ... if it were out of balance, then the price levels would move very rapidly to put them back in balance.
That is why each market player needs to make up their own mind. Personally, I think the little bit of FED tightening so far is not a bad thing, and that the markets will be good next year. Everything Wall Street DOES NOT UNDERSTAND about Trump's economy, and which is making them nervous nellies, will turn out to be good things overall.
But that's just my opinion, and it's guaranteed there are exactly opposing opinions out there in equal measure (see explanation above).
Markets are wonderful things.
no...you rightly asked the question.
I was thinking more along the lines of Paul Krugman
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/24/opinion/trump-economy-stock-market.html
I, on the other hand, need to read through to the end of thread, of which any “Q” thread is like the never-ending story.
If true, that is some f’ed up s__t.
Those people need to be taken down......
Because it appears to me that is exactly what they admitted doing.
Wondering if anyone has seen or can provide some decent legal analysis on this.
Me too, I would like to see that investigated.
Mueller has indicted a number of people on "Conspiracy to defraud the US Government" where his definition of "defraud" is to interfere with the proper functioning of the government in some way. So, for instance, the Russians were charged with this because the FEC has the proper function of regulating campaign spending and the Russians (Troll Farm) didn't file the appropriate forms.
So, using this same logic all these Obama/Clinton Deep State types are guilty of "Conspiracy to Defraud the US Government" because lawful change of leadership is a prime function of the entire election process, and they conspired to prevent or interfere with it.
We need a good Mueller to counter the bad Mueller. For a while many hoped it was Huber. That hope seems to be a false one though, so we still need a champion.
Anonymous tweet says
If everything I’ve learned over years is correct
Q drops, Clock, Potus tweets, 8Chan, discussions
ETA is ????
I could be wrong
Tomorrow
The clock lines Drop 44/55 at [:55]
Hours 11 & 5
Also lines w 10/28 “HRC arrested”
If you draw a circle over clock
& the above you get a Q
I looked at those post numbers on this thread and didn’t see dead cat bounce mentioned. Were you referring to another thread?
Page can add Attorneys as he sees fit. No Judge can deny counsel. Page is trying to get Discovery and Summary Judgement. Then he can unload on these scumbags.
The news about Peter Thiel’s (hack spit)startup business administering “young blood” to rich people has been in the news for over a year, I read about it before Q was on the scene. The linked article states “young adults”. They get it younger than 18, kids in high school are heavily pressured to donate blood regularly. SICK!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jack, I took a peak at some non-Q threads, so I know in that alternate world what you say is true.
But it is far from true on the Q thread.
I don't want to relitigate the whole argument, but I just do not understand the underlying theory of those who think Trump is surrounded by incompetents and/or traitors, and is helpless in the face of all this opposition.
I just do not see it that way. I see a man who is obviously a genius by virtue of rising to the top in profession after profession (business, entertainment, politics); who has vanquished every opponent who has faced him directly; who played the media like a fiddle in order to accomplish the impossible of becoming President in his first election ever ... and so on.
Yet many good FReepers seem to think he is ignorant, hamstrung by deep state and outmatched?
To me, thinking that requires a much bigger gulp of Kool-Aid than anything we discuss in Q world.
You have mail!
I don’t want to relitigate the whole argument, but I just do not understand the underlying theory of those who think Trump is surrounded by incompetents and/or traitors, and is helpless in the face of all this opposition.
I just do not see it that way. I see a man who is obviously a genius by virtue of rising to the top in profession after profession (business, entertainment, politics); who has vanquished every opponent who has faced him directly; who played the media like a fiddle in order to accomplish the impossible of becoming President in his first election ever ... and so on.
Yet many good FReepers seem to think he is ignorant, hamstrung by deep state and outmatched?
To me, thinking that requires a much bigger gulp of Kool-Aid than anything we discuss in Q world.
Yes indeed. In order for the “nothing is happening and Mueller is about to ruin Trump and is out of control etcetcetc” that means Trump has to be a helpless fool. In other words, he would have to totally change from who he was in private life as soon as he took the oath of office.
All the “woe is us Trump is helpless, stupid and doomed” messages originate, imho, with Trump haters who want to bring him down. And suckers and fools are influenced.
.@FLOTUS Melania and I were honored to visit our incredible troops at Al Asad Air Base in Iraq. GOD BLESS THE U.S.A.! pic.twitter.com/rDlhITDvm1— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 26, 2018
Yes indeed. In order for the nothing is happening and Mueller is about to ruin Trump and is out of control etcetcetc that means Trump has to be a helpless fool. In other words, he would have to totally change from who he was in private life as soon as he took the oath of office.
All the woe is us Trump is helpless, stupid and doomed messages originate, imho, with Trump haters who want to bring him down. And suckers and fools are influenced.
***************************************************
These are the “tru cons” who’s opinions are wholly owned and operated by the msm and neo-con talking heads and are the reason the GOP is treasonous uniparty it has become.
Those are Q post numbers.
ThankQ! I know, it seems disrespectful to forget his name, and I know he had a nick (Beebo). Fly it like you stole it! what a way to go. (I'm totally ignoring all the hassle this flight created...the only one who died was the one who wanted to die...and I think he got mad respect from the aviation community.)
I have a suspicion that there could be some concentrated attempts to damage President Trump by targeting the economy. I realize day-to-day market fluctuations are not an indicator of overall economic health, but many people do not know that. Instead, they will be focusing on the headlines touting large market losses. Today's large swing in the opposite direction feels suspicious, too.
Back in June, Bill Maher said he was hoping for an economic collapse so we can get rid of the President, saying I think one way you get rid of Trump is a crashing economy. So please, bring on the recession.
Note recent headlines such as, Trump's meddling is bad for the economy, The Trump tax cuts are putting America in a hole, Will an economic slowdown hurt Trump in 2020? and Would a weak economy hurt Trump in 2020?
These all further the impression that using the economy to discredit the President is their ticket for getting him out of the way.
What would be interesting to figure out is exactly who would be willing to suffer short term losses (i.e., two more years) in order to reap bigger benefits when they are back in control of the White House. What about Marc Mezvinsky?
What could be done to counter these measures if it were true?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.