[pax_et_bonum]

Assigned our own thread because we believe in Q? If FR wanted us to take our discussion to some other spot, I think I would rather they had told us to do that than assigning us our own water fountain and then giving us rather subjective vague rules on how to use the fountain. It just feels like they’ve assigned us some kind of second class citizen status and that feels bad.

One of FR’s purposes is to document history as it’s being made.

Keeping all of the Q research together on one series of threads is perfect for documenting the progress of your research and for others finding information later on.

Also, most of the time it should help to keep the focus on research without being continually side-tracked by those who don’t think Q is authentic.

I would consider it an honor to be allowed to have an ongoing series of threads here on FR.

[MWestMom]

That is an excellent perspective.

Also, most of the time it should help to keep the focus on research without being continually side-tracked by those who don't think Q is authentic.

This I do not find to be accurate when many threads are constantly side-tracked by bad actors. Freepers are very nice people and engage with them to convince to consider the evidence or merely go away using much of the thread and bandwidth :).

Perhaps, too, it may have felt more of an honor if we were not warned not to mention Q on any other thread on the entire site. Again isolated.

Never the less pax-et-bonum, thank you for your thoughts!