Replies

"I am talking about the denial by RCs that the one true church is the Mystical Body of Christ as made up of all properly baptized believers in the risen Lord Jesus, including former RCs, now faithful evangelicals"

This is what you believe. Ya could look it up. Try googling "Catechism of the Catholic Church," search word "Baptism". I dont h ave time to link it right now, because I'm off to Mass and anRCIA lesson, followed by singing at a Funeral Mass. But I'll be back later for the discussion.

Have a nice Saturday of the Third Week in Advent, my brother in Christ. Tagline

Doctrinally speaking (not individual cases), in the light of classic Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus teaching, where do you overall class former RCs as myself, who certainly know of the claims of Rome to be the necessary one true church, but objectively find them unwarranted in the light of the only wholly inspired substantive authoritative record of what the NT church believed?

Once again this is not an answer to the question, and what I am asking is actually bases on Catholic teaching, yet which sees variant interpretations.

So once again i will twice ask you to answer a question, adding this one to the list what was already avoided being actually answered. I would advise you not to engage in attempts to defend Rome unless you will actually deal with these challenges.

Have a nice Saturday of the Third Week in Advent, my brother in Christ. Tagline

Thanks for the sentiment, but I can say that I perceive very few RCs have actually become born again, while many RCs understand the CCC as exclude as being in Christ. such enlightened former RCs and reprovers of here as myself. And i actually think such RCs have the stronger case in the light of so much historical Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus decrees.