“evaluation of issues” has never implied or guaranteed an extensive investigation.... in another statement Sessions (now long gone) said that Huber would “review” some of these “matters” and “advise” him. Does that sound like a guarantee of a deep and thorough investigation? No, Sessions was merely putting off Congressional calls for a 2nd special counsel by saying he would ask Huber’s advice and Huber would consult with the Inspector General (Horowitz).
Now I am not as pessimistic as some, I think it is ***possible*** that much more is going on behind the scenes than the public (or Congress) has any idea of. But hope and possibility are not certainty and guarantee and actual investigative results or PROSECUTIONS.
The FreeQs take every hint and every glimmer of something and turn it into a raging certitude about vast machinations and historic projects. Is it ***possible*** that Huber and/or Horowitz will come out with some crushing report or investigation leading to prosecutions that will be a game-changer?
Sure, lots of things are possible, but so far there is not much EVIDENCE or REASON to believe it (unless you believe everything coming from a secretive anonymous internet oracle who fakes his “insider” status and has been wrong about so many things in the past).
So far, we have’t even seen McCabe or Strzok facing charges!!! Never mind Comey, etc. So what are the real chances that Clintons and their cronies will be facing charges? Pretty modest chance, I say, but I am not without plenty of HOPE.
Okay, then.
That is the ***entire point*** of the Q threads.