Exactly. And that's how we know you're a troll.
And, oh, your projection is showing.
oh I have attempted plenty of rational discussions with the Q types over the past year, but it is usually impossible to get any thoughtful, knowledgeable responses.
For example, I never could get any Q follower to explain how Q’s strategic ignorance and incompetence discussed in this comment (relating to a Q drop) could be defended:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3652490/posts?page=319#319
Now, more than 13 months since Q FALSELY boasted that “4” US carrier battle groups were on station near North Korea to “defend” the transition (which is still ongoing, apparently for a great deal longer), various US carrier groups have sailed to many parts of the globe.... but Q’s naive notion that 4 US carrier battle groups were on station indefinitely to “defend” around the Koreas in transition was just silly. IT DID NOT HAPPEN THAT WAY.
It was an “exercise” for a few days in the Sea of Japan, not a long-term presence to “defend” against Russia, China, and North Korea. It was obvious from this any many other Q-drops that the person(s) behind Q is an amateur who simply scours the web for interesting nuggets to try to plug into his/their predetermined narrative.