[Teacher317]

Show me the actual equipment used... keeping in mind the enormous battery packs and 1" tape recorders that would have had to have been used.

Yeah, because NASA gets most of their equipment from Radio Shack. *eyeroll*

Do you also believe that the SR-71 (built in 1962-1964) never achieved its records, and had to use parts off the shelf?

SMH

And, by the way, a 10 second search found the info... " built around the Hasselblad 500EL body... and packed an Planar 80mm f/2.8 lens... loaded with 70mm film, two with color, one with black and white... For black and white they used 70mm perforated Kodak Panatomic-X ‘fine-grained’ film with an ASA rating of 80. For color, they could’ve used any combination of Kodak Ektachrome SO–68, Kodak Ektachrom SO–121, and Kodak 2485, the latter of which featured a ‘super light-sensitive’ ASA rating of 1,600."

we'll overlook the phony "earth" in the sky... which is an entirely wrong size and shape for the earth to be seen from the moon. It would be huge

Further, if you actually had ANY knowledge of photography, you'd know that background items can vary greatly in apparent size depending on the distance to the main subject, and numerous lens settings.

[Sontagged]

Uh... NASA said it used RCA cameras on the moon. You do understand NASA invented the CGI processes, right?

Oh, no I believe the SR 71 was a great machine... Gary Powers is a hero of mine, tho his was an earlier U2.

The government often initiates new technology. That’s why the liberals at NASA are apparently lying, or obfuscating as to how they “lost” and “destroyed” the knowledge and technology to get to the moon.

Especially since the Chinese are going to the moon.

[Sontagged]

Oh, yeah, as for the background shot of the earthrising from the moon's surface, c. Apollo 11? The Earth is too small. Also, the angle never changes from the moon surface shot to the shot inside the capsule, from the window...

... or is that why the Apollo 11 footage got "erased"? LOL