[amorphous]

So, yea. I don't think I overreacted at all. We have a fundamental disagreement.

I'll give you this: you've been here, in the thick of things, much longer than I; though sometimes it helps to see things through a different pair of eyes.

I don't believe we're as far apart as you want to portray and think you will read into what I wrote, what you will.

If it's your opinion "We have a fundamental disagreement.", who am I to argue?!

#CallItLikeISeeIt

#SoSaysI

[little jeremiah]

One more CR twatter thread about Flynn and Mueller. I should act on my twatter account (totally unused and I don't know how to use it) so I could get threads unrolled...Sorry for big place spaces, they are just there and I can't snip em.

1) From the scores of people tagging @dbongino on my Flynn Memo thread that went bonkers yesterday, I’m guessing he got a look at it.

No matter who’s side Mueller is on, he is working with Huber. And the Russia investigation is OVER! We are winning! Love the show Dan! https://t.co/4lCgYduA7H— Clandestine Rosenstein (@ClandestineRos1) December 6, 2018

2) I’ve been listening to @dbongino every day since 628. Sometimes I forget it’s Saturday and I’ll still try to put on the Bongino Show when I’m getting in the shower. Dan is the best, and a large chunk of what I know, is thanks to Dan and his analysis.— Clandestine Rosenstein (@ClandestineRos1) December 6, 2018

3) Dan’s show has kept me in knowledge of all of the players, names, positions, titles, documents, history, motives; everything pertinent to the legality behind what’s going on in the political war zone that is present day Washington D.C.— Clandestine Rosenstein (@ClandestineRos1) December 6, 2018

4) To my 10k new followers, thank you for the support and please give @dbongino a listen if you don’t already. His knowledge of the pieces on the chess board can help you draw your own conclusions. Show is free, https://t.co/iX24bb5DLZ— Clandestine Rosenstein (@ClandestineRos1) December 6, 2018

5) However, we do disagree on the color of Mueller’s hat.

As it pertains to the Flynn sentencing memo, that caveat doesn’t really matter. We win regardless!

-Zero jail time
-Zero evidence of conspiracy
-Russia investigation is no longer ongoing
-Testimony passed to Huber— Clandestine Rosenstein (@ClandestineRos1) December 6, 2018

6) No matter how you look at that, we win. The “significant evidence” that Flynn gave over was in reference to the unspecified ongoing criminal investigation. We know this, as it’s redacted, because it’s still ongoing. Russia is not redacted, because it’s no longer ongoing. pic.twitter.com/nFZZLOAgVM— Clandestine Rosenstein (@ClandestineRos1) December 6, 2018

7) It’s spelled out for us clear as day and this is what is most important.

If the name of the investigation that Flynn gave evidence to can’t be named because the investigation is ongoing, why is the Russia investigation named?

Because it’s not ongoing!— Clandestine Rosenstein (@ClandestineRos1) December 6, 2018

8) Mueller has been done with his investigation. They found nothing. There never was anything. As it pertains to the Trump/Russia conspiracy theory.

So Mueller’s Russia investigation is done, and he’s at the very least assisting with other ongoing investigations. That’s Huge pic.twitter.com/R5yqlp1yEP— Clandestine Rosenstein (@ClandestineRos1) December 6, 2018

9) This is why Trump hasn’t fired Mueller. This is why Trump didn’t fire Rod Rosenstein. Because they are working on more than just the Russia case, as explained in the sentencing memo. Whether by alliance or by political power, Trump made Mueller do what he wants.— Clandestine Rosenstein (@ClandestineRos1) December 6, 2018

10) I simply find it too perfect to be an accident. As I know Trump to be a master tactician, he would not willingly create an uncontrollable variable on the battlefield when he already has enough of those to deal with.

Bottom Line? WE WIN THEY LOSE! pic.twitter.com/uuav0tSeTw— Clandestine Rosenstein (@ClandestineRos1) December 6, 2018

Comment on the above thread:

And Trump was already briefed on most of what we now know regarding "spygate" WHEN he supposedly interviewed Mueller for a position that he couldn't legally hold. So, if Trump knew most of spygate, what did he talk to Mueller about? @dbongino never addresses this. I love Dan 2— Charlie (@tobycharli) December 6, 2018

[bagster]

I'll give you this: you've been here, in the thick of things, much longer than I.

I have to say this. I've never been a believer in "seniority". I prefer merit.

And there are MANY smarter and more talented people on this thread and on FR in general (I count you as one of them). I ain't nobody special. But I do have semi-expertise in one field, the art of trolling. I've studied it since the internet was invented by Algore, and my personal background gives me a certain understanding of group psychology and dynamics.

I would even be so bold as to say, that the PERFECT solution to our troll problem would be that I, and I alone, respond to trolls.

What messes things up is when other, less talented people, get involved. It gives them an outlet to respond, again and again.

Total ignoration and some Bagster medicine would cure what ails 'em. This will never be possible, I do know that, but it's one boy's dream.

I don't believe we're as far apart as you want to portray and think you will read into what I wrote, what you will.

No, but we do disagree. Which is okay.

If it's your opinion "We have a fundamental disagreement.", who am I to argue?!

It's not my opinion, it's a fact. And again, that's okay. And who are you? You are amorphous. And you are SOMEBODY!

💋

#LastWordFanatic

Bagster