MSM will just ignore the weasel word editorial corrections that the Guardian switched into its article about Manafort visiting Assange in the embassy. I tuned in to several leftist channels this morning to see if any of them were talking about the first woman ever elected to the senate from Mississippi. They weren’t at that moment but one (NBC IIRC) was talking about the Manafort-Assange accusation. They just stated the meeting as fact.
There are 1 or 2 sane lefties out there.....
FTA:Jeet Heer, a progressive writer for the far-left New Republic, advised caution about the Guardian’s report.
There are genuine grounds to be cautious about the report. It is based on anonymous sources, some of whom are connected with Ecuadorian intelligence. The logs of the embassy show no such meetings. The information about the most newsworthy meeting (in the spring of 2016) is vaguely worded, suggesting a lack of certitude.
“They just stated the meeting as fact.”
Figures. Our process is just getting worse and worse. But the worst part is that at least half the people believe their lies. At least the Soviet people were smart enough to know they were being lied to.
“They just stated the meeting as fact.”
Figures. Our Pravda is just getting worse and worse. But the worst part is that at least half the people believe their lies. At least the Soviet people were smart enough to know they were being lied to.
decided to go ahead and correct Pravda, it made no sense without it!