Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor
re: "natural-born citizens"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Exploring the common-law origins of citizenship, the court observed that "new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization" and that the Constitution "does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens."

Under the common law, according to the court, "it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.

These were natives,or NATURAL-BORN CITIZENS, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."

-Chief Justice Morrison Waite

Writing the Minor v. Happersett opinion for a unanimous Supreme Court...1875

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Born in country, to citizen parents (plural)

87 posted on 11/27/2018 5:26:15 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (The Obama is about to hit the fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: ROCKLOBSTER

Except that is a misquote. Vattel never wrote that. It first appeared in a bad translation 10 years AFTER the Constitution. And Minor did not address who was a NBC because no one had any doubt for the person in question.


90 posted on 11/27/2018 6:34:11 AM PST by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

.
That is not relevent!

SCOTUS said otherwise in a case where it was the subject, and the justices were founders.

Dicta in other cases has no bearing.


93 posted on 11/27/2018 9:27:37 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson