Replies

I didn't see 'facts'. I saw your opinion regarding an article about admitted LARPS wanting to take down Q. Q has shown his value countless times, but you chose to believe known LARPS over irrefutable proofs that Q has access to things a common roleplay game wouldn't have. Opinion s aren't facts. Facts are evidence, substance. So what's your point then about Q being supportive of Sessions being a good guy if you also respect him? Q said to trust Sessions, but that's somehow a problem for you. Nobody is disputing Sessions inferior productivity levels in certain areas, only that he wasn't a black hat. We can assume Q's intended meaning, but unless he himself explains HIS intended meaning, then we have to put that comment into the stack of unknown meanings until such time as the authors intention is revealed. We don't have the information available to know what transpired between Sessions, other department personnel, and Witaker, his replacement, do we? Whether or not I like what you present as facts is irrelevant to whether or not you facts hold any evidentiary weight. What do you have to support your points? THAT's what matters. I agree completely that folks need to get they're noses out of their phones with regard to internet forums, and put action into their lives, but isn't that what Q has been encouraging, also? Learn AND act. Euphamisms = movies. Some folks don't work well with those type of expressed terms. But if it encourages people to understand the phases needed to progress, and become an acting part in this bigger than life drama, then what's the problem? Where is the dispute? The message I am getting is that either you don't grasp what's going on, or you are doing an excellent job of presenting those areas in which a lot of people struggle with in understanding this Q thing 😅.

I didn't see 'facts'. I saw your opinion regarding an article about admitted LARPS wanting to take down Q.

Q has shown his value countless times, but you chose to believe known LARPS over irrefutable proofs that Q has access to things a common roleplay game wouldn't have.

Opinion s aren't facts. Facts are evidence, substance.

So what's your point then about Q being supportive of Sessions being a good guy if you also respect him? Q said to trust Sessions, but that's somehow a problem for you.

Nobody is disputing Sessions inferior productivity levels in certain areas, only that he wasn't a black hat.

We can assume Q's intended meaning, but unless he himself explains HIS intended meaning, then we have to put that comment into the stack of unknown meanings until such time as the authors intention is revealed. We don't have the information available to know what transpired between Sessions, other department personnel, and Witaker, his replacement, do we?

Whether or not I like what you present as facts is irrelevant to whether or not your facts hold any evidentiary weight. What do you have to support your points?

THAT's what matters.

I agree completely that folks need to get they're noses out of their phones with regard to internet forums, and put action into their lives, but isn't that what Q has been encouraging, also? Learn AND act. Euphamisms = movies.

Some folks don't work well with those type of expressed terms. But if it encourages people to understand the phases needed to progress, and become an acting part in this bigger than life drama, then what's the problem? Where is the dispute?

The message I am getting is that either you don't grasp what's going on, or you are doing an excellent job of presenting those areas in which a lot of people struggle with in understanding this Q thing

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

I decided to not try and completely redo my commentary. Such spewers of ignorance that such shills typically are--are not worth my bother.

They seem incapable of dealing well with complex and massive data sets—much at all and certainly not rationally, fair-mindedly, fact-based-ly.

They seem relentlessly desperately determined to prove their manhood is longer; their obviously inadequate synapses are smarter; their inferences wiser; etc. etc. etc. ad very nauseum. They seem oblivious to how totally inadequate their data collection, their thought processes and assessments are.

Their evidently RAD fostered compulsions to always be seen as !!!RIGHT!!! seems to leave them little choice but to face the buzz-saw of the hostility of the brighter folks over and over and over again.

It gets beyond weary-ing.

(Generic) You (they) don’t believe Q. OK. Go let your ignorance fester with like-minded dolts elsewhere.

(Generic) You (they) are not going to change the minds of those who are better at data collection, data analysis and logical conclusions.

{Generic} You (they) choose to ignore most of a year’s worth of evidence and more than 2,400 Q Drops—OK. Live in ignorance and we’ll be quite comfortable ignoring your blather.wers of ignorance that such shills typically are--are not worth my bother.

They seem incapable of dealing well with complex and massive data sets—much at all and certainly not rationally, fair-mindedly, fact-based-ly.

They seem relentlessly desperately determined to prove their manhood is longer; their obviously inadequate synapses are smarter; their inferences wiser; etc. etc. etc. ad very nauseum. They seem oblivious to how totally inadequate their data collection, their thought processes and assessments are.

Their evidently RAD fostered compulsions to always be seen as !!!RIGHT!!! seems to leave them little choice but to face the buzz-saw of the hostility of the brighter folks over and over and over again.

It gets beyond weary-ing.

You (they) don’t believe Q. OK. Go let your ignorance fester with like-minded dolts elsewhere.

You (they) are not going to change the minds of those who are better at data collection, data analysis and logical conclusions.

You choose to ignore most of a year’s worth of evidence and more than 2,400 Q Drops—OK. Live in ignorance and we’ll be quite comfortable ignoring your blather.

I realize I'm addressing shills and not you in this abbreviated commentary. No, I don't believe such shills are worth pinging.