Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: John4.11
Didn’t POTUS already say to declas but DOJ (Sessions?) said they had to wait because of FIVEYES spying? (my words, too) which could have been cover for on-going investigation.

You make sense. And you may have the right of this. I do remember they were said to be reviewing before DECLAS in order to remove any classified stuff. There were some, especially on the main board, who interpreted that to mean the derps doing CYA. And I think FIVEEYES is tied in with that. And we already know the derps work that way.

My brain farts may be overly optimistic. I had just also considered that perhaps the internal review for classified info might be securing data that Huber & Company are using in their investigation. I am one who still holds a high opinion of Sessions. I've seen what he did in Alabama. His trademark was to make people think he was inactive while be collated a wealth of hard evidence. I could be far from target on this one but would not be personally surprised if FISA DECLAS is tied to the Huber investigation.

1,878 posted on 11/21/2018 10:12:45 AM PST by Wneighbor (Weaponize your cell phone! Call your legislators every week.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1863 | View Replies ]


To: Wneighbor

I could be far from target on this one but would not be personally surprised if FISA DECLAS is tied to the Huber investigation.
________________________________________________
Well, I could be off target, too, cause I agree with that. I am, however, still learning and trying to catch up. There is SO MUCH info to absorb and my brain isn’t as young as it used to be. ;)


1,882 posted on 11/21/2018 10:19:44 AM PST by John4.11 (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1878 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson