So in your expert opinion it would be a better marketing strategy for a conservative “discussion forum” to be identified as Anti-First Amendment by banning discussion of certain subjects? Do you think the owner will put you on the board that gets to pick the subjects ALLOWED for discussion?
I could care less what you discuss, as long as it is confined to a small part of the board so it doesnt crowd out others rights. The site owner may prohibit any and all topics as is their absolute right. For example FR doesnt allow 8 Chan 4 Chan stuff and restricts Q stuff to 1 thread. So be it. He he owns the board makes the rules. Just be glad FR hasnt followed other social media sites and prohibited all discussion.