You’re description is interesting. The way they try to compare Quidam to Q makes it sound like Quidam was something or someone bad. You make it sound like Quidam was fun to converse with.
I often wondered if Quidam merely overreached his access and ‘omniscience.’ That his information was partially or initially more or less accurate but that the DEEP STATE overrode those data points/facts before the dust settled. But I didn’t really follow his stuff very closely.
Quidam tickled ears around here for a long time- almost as good as Q!!
The Quiddam threads were fun but ultimately he was full of crap. He made all kind of predictions about what was going to happen in the Clinton WH and none of them ever panned out.
To be honest, last November I posted on a thread about this strange poster I'd been following called Q who reminded me of Quiddam. That was right after he said Podesta was going to be arrested and the NG would be mobilised. I've long, long since disabused myself of any notion comparing Q to Quiddam.