Been pondering. The last Q Drop was a long one of great substance and detail.
Have wondered how much the Q-Team does a lot of observing, research, intel, analyses of the responses from all interest groups after a major Q-Drop or series of Q-Drops.
I think that’s what I’d do if I were part of the Q-Team. I’d be particularly interested in what the black hat responses were. Then I’d be keenly interested in what the responses and chatter was among the Q fans and avid supporters.
After sufficient observations and analyses over a sufficient number of days, I’d begin to map out the Q-Drops going forward—the next sequence of drops. Or, as part of the team, would suggest such for/to the team.
__________________________________________________________
Yes, it was... I need to re-read it a few more times!!
That’s a really good question. I have the feeling that Q/Q-team knows - pretty much beforehand — how some groups can be expected to respond. If A then B, or if B then C. If not C then WHAT NOW (hahaha / argh / eeek).
Just knowing someone’s ideology provides a foundation to determine what probably will happen is my guess.
Group think stuff makes group think responses. Not struggle-free, but oh so predictable within some parameters. How interesting it would be to compare groups very close in their thinking to see how things work out. What happens when they disagree? Does one prevail? Do they discover a greater good to unite them. Or a worse outcome to further divide them?
The interesting ppl to look at (it seems to me anyway), would be the leaders. What is their ideology? Education. Life experiences. Strengths and weaknesses. Oh, my. Yep, that would be interesting.
In thinking how effective Q is, I would think there are academic and street smart ppl on the Q-team that are able to discern more than we can imagine. I would think they have every bit of learning and technology that is available to man whenever they map out things.
I would wager some infighting... but able to step back and away from ego. Maybe some things take time to figure out, but somehow I think most of it has been worked out a while back.
I marvel at the drops. There’s amazing information there. And I’ve only read such a small portion...
Jocko... I enjoyed reading what you could envision doing if you were part of the Q-team. I hope you will find a niche to satisfy that longing. Working with Q-team would really be something.
...my own imaginings are much simpler. Pretty typical stuff. I do love FR (amazing ppl here) and reading and watching and listening to all things politic.
...now to head back to lurkdom. Comfortable there.
You triggered a conjecture . . . what would I do if I led the Q-Team in terms of focus groups? I doubt they are using focus groups.
I suspect they are more likely to use NSA and other solidly based actuarial research--wouldn't have to be a REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE that way--could be literally considering THE GENERAL POPULATION AS A WHOLE on a lot of issues--kind of like Scandinavia.
They could have a team of psychologists and another team of sociologists and another team of anthropologists and a combo of the leaders of those teams contributing answers to queries of WHAT IF'S from the Q-Team.
Orrrrrrrr, less functional, imho, but still workable ... they could sequester a range of military members in proportions representative of the general population on a range of traits, habits, values etc. and then use that group as a focus group in a deeply sequestered setting. I doubt they are doing that.
My best guess is that they are using teams of social science professionals to give input to the Q-team from very extensive and high level research--broad and deep research from decades long--particularly the last year or 2.
Orrrrrrrrrr, the Q-Team and Trump are using some such input from some such experts but mostly are going with their gut, intuition, spiritual sense etc. and maybe even some authentic Christian prophetic types. For some reason, I doubt that's exactly it, either. I think that would be Trump's inclination but given the stakes, the military types might be more inclined to lean on inputs from experts than go by the seat of their pants.
Then there are the military GAMES experiments that have a long history. They could have been playing tons of such games for many months with lots of data from that bunch of stuff.
I continue to be amazed at their impressive successes one after another. I call that evidence of God's wisdom and knowledge being injected into Trump directly and the Q-Team directly and maybe indirectly.
Time will tell.