[zaxtres]

That picture if looked at closer does not show an intact plane as the fuselage is much brighter and the right wing appears to be sheared off. If one looks at what appears to be the wing it doesn’t line up right with the rest of the plane. This is not an intact plane image. There would be a tail section that isn’t there as the the plane ends unusually short. This may not be the plane in question but it is not an image of an intact plane.

[zaxtres]

Additionally, there appears to be a landing path that comes up diagonally from the bottom right of the picture. The yellow line is across it in the first picture. The jungle is at a different level in this path. Again this is not a picture of an intact plane and it may not be the plane in question. Only visual verification (boots on the ground) will verify this.

[pfflier]

Any commercial passenger airplane entering densely wooded areas at flight speed would very likely lose it's wings and they would not be adjacent to their design position with respect to the wreckage of the fuselage.

It is also very likely that the empennage and rear fuselage would separate behind the wing roots and trail the main wreckage in the debris path.

We are all going to see what we want to see in that poor resolution photo. You know how I feel.