Children, you say? Emotional needs, you say?
Everybody keeps going on about personal attacks and then you post that.
But I'm the bad guy?
What am I supposed to make of you, Mrsmith? That's twice on this thread alone that you've "personally attacked" me while claiming to hold the high moral ground.
Surely you (and others') are intellectualy honest enough to see the irony?
And this is exactly how it goes on the Q thread and non-Q threads when the subject of Q (or Sessions) comes up.
The personal insults fly and, if pushed back against, then the claims of victimhood from the instigators start. Then the mods are called. This latest trend is to cast the "Q-pers" as a group of monsters trying to be "divisive".
I wonder if you all reading this know all the vile names I personally have been called, not to mention the entire group of FReepers who dare to discuss Q or to "Trust Sessions" or "The Plan". And it has been like this since the beginning of the year.
Talking about "Q" or supporting Sessions, in and of itself, is a high felony and evidence of retardation to many here. But we're the bad guys and I'm a "child with emotional problems".
Really, Mrsmith. How would you react if somebody called you a child with emotional problems right to your face? Or called you a kook, or retarded, a loser, stupid, etc? That's what many who have posted on this thread call their fellow FReepers who commit the crime of Q-ing. All that and worse.
But we're the bad guys?
Just yesterday, ransomnote (and you will not find a kinder, gentler soul) made a new thread. A poster named Eddie01 immediately got on it and "cussed her out" personally, claiming that the "way" she structured the thread wasn't up to his standards. The curse words flew. Then he lashed out at other thread participants in the same manner.
Did his posts get pulled by the mods? Yes, as they should have. Did he get suspended, like I have on numerous occasions for far, far less? No. He didn't get suspended. p> But we're the bad guys? I'm the bad guy?
Anyway. I just ask you to see things from my perspective or that of the "Q-pers" (which in and of itself is insulting and condenscending).
If you are being honest and fair-minded, you (all) will change your reading of the situation.
And keep in mind a saying I like to use. "Don't start nothin', won't be nothin".
Anyway. I keep trying to talk to people. Maybe that's my real crime. I've always been hard-headed, and I truly believe that something good is going on here with President Trump and his alternative psyop/communication operation.
It's a whole new world, and a whole new kind of President. Why not Q?
I hope it doesn't bother anybody that I spoke up on this thread, but my name was mentioned so I think that gives me license. If there's a problem, let me know and I'll scurry back to my sanctuary city. But know that I'm just not a giver-upper. Maybe that's why I'm a "Q-per" in the first place.
#KeepHopeAlive
You stated ...”I wonder if you all reading this know all the vile names I personally have been called”...
But it is you that creates the environment for that. In part you can’t help that for it’s in your personality....but you do offend people and this not in a debatable way but a condescending manner... especially if they’re trying to reason with you. The game becomes one upping rather than discovering truth. But then Q is a game after all.
Mrsmith and I have butted heads in the past, which may explain some things about his posts.
Yes, I remember, Mrsmith.