Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

Agreed-the study is stupid and useless. Vitamin D without Calcium, K2 and the other necessary elements of nutrition is not going to do anything-beneficial or otherwise-someone just wanted money for a yet another “study” to show that what was good lst year is bad now-look at the way everything from vitamins to beef, coffee, wine, butter, etc, etc has seemingly changed good/bad for health over recent years...

I was raised in a health freak family on a ranch-like all the rest, I’ve been living drug-free from childhood-and there was no processed food on the table-I still live that way-drug free and high protein organic diet. I take 3000-4000 D3 daily along with my other vitamins/supplements daily-I manage my own body and health-I live in that body and know it best.

I work out with weights and resistance 3X per week, so I take an L-Arginine and Citrulline supplement to max my muscle tone and mass. My job requires physical work-mostly outdoors. I weigh the same as I did at 17, but I’m more muscular than I was then-I’m also over 65-I’ll stay with the natural, rural life-it has worked well for me. I do like occasional tobacco and wine-maybe I can apply for a grant, do a study on natural living using computer calculations instead of a group of real humans-I can certainly use the extra money...


44 posted on 10/09/2018 12:33:09 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Texan5

You rock! You’re doing it right, Lady.


80 posted on 10/10/2018 12:36:15 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson