Replies

New: Title TBD

2368

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI

8 Oct 2018 - 10:39:07 AM

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/410287-fbis-smoking-gun-redactions-protected-political-embarrassment-not📁

[Why not?] [if true] D's do not want DECLAS [TO PROVE] POTUS was colluding w/ RUSSIA?

Why are D's opposed to DECLAS if what they say is true?

DECLAS would [PROVE] evidence v. POTUS to obtain FISA WARRANT - why the block?

Define 'Projection'.

See article above - redactions made to 'protect' exposing the REAL TRUTH?

Logical thinking.

McCabe Memos [source] >>> NYT [RR] 'wear a wire'

Sessions Subpoena >>> McCabe Memos delivery to House

Baker Testimony >>> House [what was learned?][D]

[Next Up][RR] Testimony >>> House

Locked & Loaded.

233 posted on 10/08/2018 10:45:01 AM PDT by pbear8 (the Lord is my light and my salvation)

The McCabe memo source is in brackets now; as is RR.

244 posted on 10/08/2018 10:51:36 AM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/410287-fbis-smoking-gun-redactions-protected-political-embarrassment-not📁 this article from The Hill was posted last night - notice the known trolls attempting to debunk it... https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3694431/posts

254 posted on 10/08/2018 10:56:55 AM PDT by bitt (We want judges that protects us from them. They, the ruling elites, want judges that PROTECT THEM!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794