Because I don't have the time or energy to do a deep dive and/or fact check.
And because the little I have a 'gut feel' for -- that Sessions is Deep State -- is decried by Q.
I think, said and done, you'll be wrong about that, bro.
Using as narrow a point as a "gut feel" toward one man seems like a trivial excuse for dismissing 2,380 published posts -- and for denigrating those who work diligently to extract Probable Cause for warrants from them.
All I asked was for you to take a look at a single post of mine...
I can guarantee that there is a lot of valid news there that you will never get via the DSM...
TXnMA
Well, Q does say TRUST SESSIONS. I hadn’t heard suspicion that he was a deepie for some time. There are plenty here who still consider him likely compromised. Moved into that position like a ship across a harbor channel and then sunk. But who knows? We’ll all find out at the same time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I am sure you recall that Jeff Sessions was crucial towards Trump getting elected.
He was the first Senator by a long shot to join the campaign. If he had gone with Cruz, as Cruz certainly hoped, I really think the combined forces against him might have stopped Trump from getting the first-ballot votes at the convention ... and then I think we can all imagine the GOPe would have been able to prevent this great President from ever achieving the nomination.
Even before the campaign, Sessions was a courageous voice for stopping the invasion of illegal immigration ... probably the most steadfast voice in the Senate.
These facts are hardly compatible, in my opinion, with Sessions being deep-state, or "Sleepy" or any of the other accusations with which he has been targeted (often by well-intentioned patriots).
I admit my opinion is further weighted by having spent some of the best years of my life in the deep South. So my "Gut feeling" may be calibrated differently than yours. But ...
I started out being careful not to reference Q as a "primary" source, but just as an intriguing possibility for further research--and very entertaining in the bargain. But over time I have evolved to affording the Q group more credence than any media source, including FoxNews. (This is both an acquired taste and, one might say, damning with faint praise. But it is based upon my experience of almost a YEAR since Q appeared, mostly seen through the lens of this FReeQ thread.)
One last point: Like you, I do not have time to deep-dive most of this. Nobody does, really, which in one sense is a PROOF of Q ... due to the sheer volume of often obscure information, including photos from exotic locations or inside the Oval Office or AFI. But fortunately, we have a wonderful group of Freepers right here on this thread who are as informed as anyone in the world on all matters Q. They delve into specific aspects that most interest them, and provide links to the best information and analysis from other sources.
I think most FReepers sense that we are living through very historic times. But I also think I can speak for most of us that hang around on this thread in stating that we believe we are getting an extra peek behind the curtain, like a backstage pass for at least some of it.
We are not "True believers," but true searchers who are totally aware that some of Q's statements have not proven true (at least not yet) and some of the prognostications have turned out to be wrong (proving Q may be an insider with deep intelligence connections and analytical capabilities, but is not a puppet master who can force others to act as expected in highly contentious situations).
Yet, we still find great value to following the crumbs put out by Q and developed by the armies of anons as well as our FReeQish friends here.
Hope you'll hang around awhile and enjoy the show.