Stop being me.
:)
Bagster
Posted on 10/07/2018 11:44:39 PM PDT by ransomnote
Stop being me.
:)
Bagster
Steven, did you just switch gears between your #409 and your #414?
It is astonishing, really, the layers. To understand POTUS (a genius) and Q we have to see far beneath the surface ... and then look in a mirror and see before and behind us.
Is Sessions good or bad? Okay that’s a softball for Q people, but not for so many FReepers and earnestly patriotic pundits. For example: Lou Dobbs. Is Lou playing a role, reading a script, playing his part to keep the RATS off balance? What about Hannity?
And then we get to the “reliable” ones. I got caught yesterday criticizing Nunes for the shallowness of his approach on Maria’s show ... until one of the Congrssman’s faithful constituents pointed out that HE TOO MAY BE READING A SCRIPT (his co-star none other than the money honey).
Then there is the now-smiling [RR] virtually wearing that AF1 Boarding Pass on his sleeve.
Mueller? I have stated my suspicions but Oh MY ... how can a simple law enforcement officer live two or more years of his life as a double agent, despised by the very people he is helping? Is that what they all do? And what about Comey? How did such a SLEAZE fool everyone into thinking he was the last honest cop?
Lindsay Graham? Did No Name have some hold on him? Is he no longer the hopelessly blackmailed perv we thought he was? Did POTUS somehow set him free?
Through all of this FOG, the only constant is President Trump. One of the greatest promoters in the history of the world’s greatest promoter nation—someone who could give lessons to P.T. Barnum—is our most constant and reliable voice.
Other than the inscrutable, anonymous Q, of course—who might or might not be another role played by Trump ... or playing Trump ...
It’s so DELICIOUS!
OMG. Kate Hopkin gives such a powerful message. She is humorous, but also delivers a sobering message... Thanks for sharing.
Bagster
Outrage must be tempered with reason. If we trust the plan, we can tamp down the outrage most of the time.
I watch Trump. He seems content with the progress and he knows all the facts. If he’s okay with the progression, I try to be okay with it too. I trust him. He seems to genuinely care about us.
In those time my anger breaks through, I remember that Q team understands. “Those who know cannot sleep.”
Didn’t you hear the President’s speech about “Presumed innocent?”
Before this is over, I predict we’ll be hearing more of that. I just hope the worst of the worst can be convicted (starting with Brennan).
Sara Carter reported that tomorrow there would be news about evidence that a high level DOJ employee was actively working to undermine POTUS...perhaps Sally Yates is the one ;)
>Lindsay Graham? Did No Name have some hold on him? Is he no longer the hopelessly blackmailed perv we thought he was? Did POTUS somehow set him free?
YES.
“Collusion” IS A CRIME in one section of the law: ANTITRUST.
IF the DoJ gets involved, and wins a case, they have access to a unique set of REMEDIES not available to other litigants. These are known as “Structural Remedies.”
It means they can break a company up.
Happened to Standard Oil, and the Bell System ... both amongst the most powerful companies in America in their times.
Funny you should ask.
I just got this SKYPE from Q.
Bagster
Thank you, huldah.
Not a paytriot.
In fact, I pay JR/FR for the privilege of doing what I can for America.
#NotaboutOneIndividual
Bagster
And I haven't heard any scuttlebutt that Salvation Army is involved in human trafficking or is an arm of the International Derp State, like some Red Crosses who I won't mention.
Bagster
Good man, goodman.
Nothing to stop you from earning some coins by giving a great product a wider dispersion that would BE VERY GOOD FOR THE REPUBLIC . . . and then giving those extra coins to FR.
IIRC, they and Samaritan’s purse have the lowest overhead of all NGO’s helping the poor and crises afflicted populations except for Operation Blessing that has 0.0 overhead because CBN covers their overhead.
I'm pretty sure she said she didn't remember how she got home, and nobody had the cajones to push her on it. Not even the lesbian prosecutor person.
She never said no such a thing about cell phones. She's stupid, but not that stupid.
Bagster
RE: Christine Ford - Cellphone in 1982?
It’s not in her letter to Feinstein nor in the testimony transcripts that I have searched.
I believe it’s a “Fake Meme”.
The visual of Rosenstein waking up in bed is....ahhhhh no
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.