Posted on 10/07/2018 11:44:39 PM PDT by ransomnote
What I did NOT like about that post (implying our intelligence is at a low) was the post where all our info about FR is displayed. I feel that was an invasion of my privacy...not that I have anything to hide. I just don’t like it when someone says “Hey, I can get dirt on you. Wanna see what I know about you? How about I show everyone what I know about you?”
FR is not run by Goggle, is it?
Well, what I know about top loaders is this: Dirty clothes, meet bucket. Bucket, meet creek. Wet clothes, meet clothesline. :) LOL!
My life is too boring to have anything to hide.
I was wondering about that too. WHO did the intending? And did Mueller’s actions fulfilled the “intended” purpose?
There have been no leaks.
That was posted 45 minutes after Q posted about Yates. Q 2358 EDT and American Anomaly 2143 PDT
Oh my gosh! I just went back and saw that! Unreal!
That would probably work better. LOL
With all due respect to JR, what makes many of the non-q-believers trolls is this:
Rather than discussing the topics of the thread they question the premises of the thread itself.
My husband's uncle bought a new one. He can't wash his sheets in it. They blow the machine up! He kept his old one and had moved it to the basement. Now when we visit we can wash clothes upstairs and sheets downstairs. I'm going to stay with the antiques as long as I can.
Eric Holder: ‘When They Go Low, We Kick Them’
Former attorney general Eric Holder called on his fellow Democrats Wednesday to reject Michelle Obama’s famous plea for civility in the face of personal attacks in favor of a more combative approach to politics.
“Michelle [Obama] always says, ‘When they go low, we go high.’ No. No. When they go low, we kick them,” Holder told the crowd at a campaign event for Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams. “That’s what this new Democratic Party is about. We’re proud as hell to be Democrats, we’re going to fight for the ideals of the Democratic party . . . we’re in this to win.”
>>My life is too boring to have anything to hide.
Never give up hope for the future.
Well said.
And I don’t “dislike non q believers”. What is that? One, it isn’t a belief system and two, I don’t dislike anyone who doesn’t follow Q. I wish they would so they can give input and contribute knowledge and such. But I don’t dislike them.
Mark
I thought it was pretty useful, pointing to the fact that us "q-pers" are some of the most senior Freepers around.
Average FR tenure: 14.7 years!
Didn’t read that far. Guess it was a benefit afterall.
“we’re going to fight for the ideals of the Democratic party . . . we’re in this to win.”
***********************
So exactly what are the “ideals of the Democratic party”?
Kick em while they’re down? Demagogue anyone who opposes you? Destroy the Constitution? Destroy property and people? Riot at the drop of a hat? Wear masks and carry clubs? Uphold the standards of fascism, while calling all who oppose the Dems “fascists”? Lie, cheat, steal, obstruct, and destroy? Destroy your own minions if that will promote your cause? Demand everyone and anyone to bow to you ultimate goal of imposing a Socialist Dictatorship? (etc. etc. etc.)
And the beat goes on..........and on......and on.
WWG1WGA
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
This Freerepublic board was started by a collection of conspiracy theorists who believed crazy things like that Clinton murdered some kids to hide his drug running at Mena, he had parties with a drug dealer friend and underage girls, he had multiple affairs and even raped a bunch of women, Vince Foster was murdered in the White House, Hillary corruptly made money in cattle futures and a lot of other kooky things. Those things, gospel here, were way more out there than believing in Q. But we are kooks.
Almost all of the things we believed then were either proven true or remain hidden but believed true by those who post on FR. Q will be revealed in good time. You’d think a place that got its start as it did would be more accepting.
Anybody have a link to Sally Yates lawyering up?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.