NOTE - one doesn’t have to reference “Q” in order to make points. This is something I’ve always found a lazy failure in logic & reason by those considered here. It goes back to the beginning, answer the questions! They have a fundamental misunderstanding about what “Q” is ... if they’d just answer the questions then they’d get the point -but they can’t + won’t. So keep “Q” out of the discussion - go right to the article or subject of interest. For example discussion of the chips from China - leave the fact “Q” aficionados have been discussing such for the better part of a year - the subject and article in Bloomberg is all that’s needed. IMO ;)
And for the love of all things Trumpian, stop pinging JimRob to every little question about Q! Use common sense, don't be a hall monitor (cos we all know that hall monitors are just power hungry!) and stop bugging Jim. I'm sure that he hears enough about us from the stuffy ol stodgers (Get off my yard!), we don't need to draw attention to ourselves.
Totally agree! And later when they ask how you figured things out then you can mention Q. But not necessary. I think Q wants us to get people to wake up and think. Not just to follow Q. Though at some point that might be what has to be done out of necessity.