Probably attending with a preference scholarship...
the future of the country is looking very very grim
if this is the kind of sheitheads that Harvard’s turning out
"Progressive" ideology sweeps aside centuries of progress among humankind and reduces those who have been seduced by its counterfeit ideas into becoming "mere automatons of misery," practicing their empty ideology in their cultish Progressive enclaves, as if their "Creator" and "Supreme judge" did not exist.
"I am not among those who fear the people. They...are our dependence for continued freedom. And to preserve their independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debts, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our callings and our creeds...our people...must come to labor sixteen hours in the twenty-four, give the earnings of fifteen of these to the government for their debts and daily expenses; and the sixteenth being insufficient to afford us bread, we must live, as they (the British) now do, on oatmeal and potatoes; have no time to think, no means of calling the mismanagers to account; but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers....This example reads to us the salutary lesson that private fortunes are destroyed by public, as well as by private extravagance. And this is the tendency of all human governments. A departure from the principle in one instance, becomes a precedent for a second; that second for a third; and so on, till the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery, to have no sensibilities left but for sinning and suffering. Then begins, indeed, the 'bellum omnium in omnia,' which some philosophers...have mistaken for the natural, instead of the abusive, state of man. And the fore-horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression." - Thomas Jefferson
Haven’t they destroyed him enough? Not only have they beaten him to a pulp, but they are kicking him in the head and pouring hot oil over him.
He can’t teach starting Jan. ‘19. He will be sitting on the Supreme Court.
So is this what the little University fascist factories have been up to?
Jacqueline will likely be appearing on cnn, msnbc, ellen, the view, etc as an example of how the “courageous youth are our future”. The left love it when the youth are learning how to stifle conservative ideas.
All of which will blow right over the little morons heads as it does not fit Jacqueline's "bright idea" that sparked at least 48 students to sign an online petition certifying they had filed a Title IX complaint.
That in itself is enought to prove they are all full of "it."
50 title IX issues in a couple of days?
.
The proper response is to make sure Kavenaugh and the other Republican-appointed justices look elsewhere for their law clerks.
I’m thinking law schools south of the Mason Dixon line should be the rule.
“Students Filed Title IX Complaints Against Kavanaugh to Prevent Him From Teaching at Harvard Law”
Students loss.
Sounds like conspiracy to me.
The irony of the Harvard LAW school 'convicting' Kavanaugh without evidence or a trial is lost on the Harvard LAW school.
He doesn’t want to teach at the cesspool anymore. They’re wasting their time.
Just because you're going to graduate from Harvard does not mean that you're particularly smart.
Case in point: Jacqueline L. Kellogg ’19, who appears to be one of those oddities best described as 'people who are educated but not smart'.
Turnabout being fair play, while I myself wouldn't do such things, nor would I even encourage others to do such things, the genie is already out of the bottle, and that bottle has been smashed into shards. There's no obvious way of returning to the status quo ante.
So, there's hardly any doubt that, as a direct result of the current, highly-toxic environment foist upon the rest of us by those such as Kellogg and her fellow travelers, there are ample numbers of nameless, faceless and independently-motivated "concerned citizens" who are already taking note of the identities of those idiots, and planning just how their past "indiscretions" and "crimes" will emerge to derail those idiots' carefully-made-but-essentially-evil plans in the future, should they appear likely to accede to any position of responsibility.
Why, based on the new 'standards' that they have put in place, with such foresight, no doubt some creative writing is already being prepared. It's a new 'sport', after all, now that they have shown us how 'truth' is such a malleable concept. We have seen the light: even though 35-year-old false allegations can apparently do the trick, it's likely a far easier task to prepare the ground contemporaneously, so that there will be plenty of incriminating documents and 'evidence' that can be trotted out at the right time and place for maximum impact.
Not only that, but I have no doubt that an insufferable SJW such as Kellogg has made plenty of enemies already, some of whom may even be masquerading as her 'friends', but who are keeping watch, taking careful notes and photographs, and maybe even embellishing some records to make them even more 'truthy'.
What, Jacqueline L. Kellogg does not keep an accurate calendar showing her daily excesses? No doubt one (or more) can be prepared. Contempraneous notes can also be prepared by future witnesses, if necessary using inks that can be reliably forensically traced to the right years. What does Jacqueline L. Kellogg do on her weekends or evenings that she will be ashamed of in twenty or thirty or forty years? Probably plenty.
Leftist idiots play "the long game." Perhaps "concerned citizens" are even now doing the same.
Liberalism is a mental illness.
You're wasting your money, Mr. Kellogg.
I accidentally (figuratively) blew up my book club this weekend. Reading Haidt’s book on morality, someone brought up politics and the near certainty of guilt since very few rape accusations are fake. (Wikipedia says 5%.)
I said that may be true of criminal cases, since the courts have due process, it is a crime to make a false police report, and you get sued for putting people in prison on a lie.
However, when you eliminate due process and presumption of innocence, the courts/tribunals like Title IX end up with a far higher percentage of fake accusations and unsubstantiated ones.
I brought up Laura Kipnis and several other female professors charged under Title IX for “sexual violence” for writing papers and giving lectures that challenged the 1/4 of women get raped stat. That means that when you just believe the victim and design a system that assumes they’re always right, you get a much larger share of false reports and politicized attacks.
Given that’s the Kavanaugh situation, the odds she’s telling the truth aren’t 95% but maybe 50-50 given how long she was silent, the timing and lack of evidence.
He’s done more for women than these snowflakes have any idea.