To: JockoManning
“But the whole Q-Team strategy is to out sensitive stuff by having the anons search Socratic questions’ answers out themselves.”
That’s my favorite part of the whole thing! Q puts up gibberish, and other people make up what it means. What if they are wrong? Will Q correct them? If so, why doesn’t Q speak clearly in the first place?
Oh, but Q has to code things because, secrets or something. Which aren’t secrets because the anons tell us what Q means.
Good grief.
794 posted on
10/01/2018 10:08:37 AM PDT by
SaxxonWoods
(Stop The Madness. Do Not Respond To Vanity Posts.)
To: SaxxonWoods
Lol and there are the true colors. Bye Felicia...
796 posted on
10/01/2018 10:11:19 AM PDT by
edzo4
("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")
To: SaxxonWoods
I understand your reasoning and perspective.
I just disagree. However, I'm weary of a list of intellectual battles hereon. So, enjoy your perspective, while you still can.
802 posted on
10/01/2018 10:17:11 AM PDT by
JockoManning
(http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
To: SaxxonWoods
Q has not been using coding in this phase (three) of this op. Pay attention. In the beginning, the research generated by anons and others was to drive the search engines to their knees.
If you had been with us since last year this you would know this already. Thanks for playing!
846 posted on
10/01/2018 11:33:05 AM PDT by
defconw
("The truth is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose and it will defend itself.")
To: SaxxonWoods
950 posted on
10/01/2018 2:31:30 PM PDT by
blu
(WWG1WGA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson