Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: stylin19a

Definitely worth a read.

Kavanaugh seems to have been hip-deep in the Vince Foster coverup, and carried on this role in the Starr “Investigation.”

I remember being dumbfounded that Starr chose to ignore Clinton’s DOZENS of true crimes (including probably collusion with Chinese espionage) and go after the intern-sex scandal, perversely leaving the perv/rapist and the witch more popular than ever.

Starr was a COVER UP artist, much like what he attempted more recently as President of Baylor University, ignoring and covering up a true rape culture (not the “Me-too” BS) in the successful football program.

What I DID NOT REALIZE back in the ‘90s “investigation” was the specific measures and destruction of the truth in which Starr/Kavanaugh actively covered up the Foster murder. (I just noticed the radio silence on all Clinton’s true crimes, both of a personal and treasonous nature.)

It is frustrating to have to support Kavanaugh (another Yalie); however, I understand he may be the best POTUS can get confirmed in the present Senate ... and also that nominating Kavanaugh was probably an incentive to get Kennedy to retire.

This Foster-Clinton sleaze coming out again is a symptom of the overall sickness or our political environment, I guess.


686 posted on 10/01/2018 7:01:21 AM PDT by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies ]


To: Disestablishmentarian

Just a minute. Starr should have gotten more goods on the Clintons after 4 years of investigating FOR SURE. I did hear him say the Vince Foster issue still bothers him. Whatever that means. As far as Baylor (and I am not associated with Baylor), the full truth is looking like the BU trustees were the ones wanting protection. The rape issue was not exclusive to football but football was the obvious fall guy. Contradictory information has continued to come out since Briles was fired and Starr left. I wonder if Starr resigned over the actions of trustees. Just wondering. Wish truth was more easily disseminated because obfuscation blows in the wind. In full disclosure, my husband played high school football with Briles and the home town folks are on Briles side. Why did Baylor send him away with $17 million settlement if he was guilty as they claimed? Any mention of his name as a possible coach gets all the smarter than smart ESPN types squealing loudly. Financially he is fine. Personally it seems very suspect and unfair to me.

There were a couple of stories last night on this thread concerning Kavanaugh’s work in a positive light.


705 posted on 10/01/2018 7:22:43 AM PDT by outinyellowdogcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson