Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

Webb doesn’t have the kind of comprehensive info POTUS and Q have, and Webb is known to sprinkle his reporting with the wild and wacky.
Just looking at how the DS has gone against Kavanaugh shows he’s not one of them. POTUS would not pull a dirty justice off the SC, to replace him with a DS justice. I believe you can relax. :)


615 posted on 09/30/2018 11:53:03 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

Your view is correct.

POTUS had the FULL COMPLETE background on Kavanaugh before ever nominating him.

Webb should stick to the streets, to beating the pavement for facts not reported. He’s making his usual projection from his personal experience to what he thinks must be going on in the Kavanaugh case. But he does not have all the information that POTUS has.

Webb has value because he teaches but what he teaches can be theory. It informs viewers of the nature of spook operations, cloak and dagger tactics. But Webb doesn’t have all that POTUS has. He makes the mistake in forgetting this.

I still like Webb but he’s stepped in it here, again. He’s stepped in it in the past on other issues. He lets his personal experience knowledgebase lead him to scenarios that he thinks must be, not actually be and he loses the fact that others have more than him which POTUS has in this case.


634 posted on 10/01/2018 4:41:00 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V (Proud Member of the Deranged Q Fringe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson