Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

Norks, we may be still at war with, that would have to be decided as a legal matter. Iran, Al Qaeda and ISIS, islamic radical terrorists, so covered under the 9/11 authorization. As to Iran, might need some interpretation by the court, it is a sovereign nation and there is no war specifically on against them. China, there is no war on. DiFiChiSpy is a traitor but not an enemy combatant. That’s my view.


1,981 posted on 10/02/2018 8:31:06 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1931 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant

So you’re basically saying that if there is no legally declared war, including the “War on Terror”, then an actor, whether US citizen or foreign national, who acts against the interests of US national security, canhot be tried in a military tribunal, no matter how egregious the crimes committed.

I personally do not have the brain, knowledge or education to know. Just trying to figure out from what others know.


1,994 posted on 10/02/2018 8:42:15 PM PDT by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1981 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson