you are right! But if she exposed to Washington Post or Building / Housing Dept. in Palo Alto, then she’s sunk ... she also backtracked on WP saying she didn’t remember (weeks later) whether she’d given a copy to WP or provided a summary. My guess + inference is that she’d given a copy to WP (for “proof” as WP said they reviewed) and was trying to deny / cover up.
so you’re saying if she gave a copy of the psych’s notes to either WP or the housing authority, that the FBI an easily get a copy without a GJ or subpoena “FBI no subpoena power [no GJ] to demand.” ??