Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JockoManning
Was traitorous noname his handler?

More like his blackmailer, IMO.

349 posted on 09/27/2018 12:05:23 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

That explanation doesn’t completely add up. If No Name was his blackmailer, the others that were part of the cabal would know the information that was being used against him, and would still be using it. Something has happened that released LG from his fears, but I don’t think it is No Name’s death alone. It was happening a few months before that. Whatever it was, he has been released from some burden, or perhaps, another explanation, is that he was given information about what the cabal was up to that he didn’t have previously. I am glad to have him back, and I guess I won’t call him Linda again (unless he backslides).


352 posted on 09/27/2018 12:10:45 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies ]

To: philman_36

I’d have thought noname was more vulnerable to blackmail. Though the lot of them are well over that line, most likely.


358 posted on 09/27/2018 12:13:40 PM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson