Posted on 09/26/2018 9:26:06 PM PDT by ransomnote
I hate to be a Debby Downer, Steve, but the statute of limitations has no bearing on this matter, if you ask me.
This isn't a "criminal investigation" per se, but a "background check".
It is my considered legal opinion (haha) that neither jurisdiction nor legality has any bearing on the legitimacy of an "FBI investigation" in this case.
At this point, it's about politics only. No criminal charges will be filed or are planned for, even by the derps. All they need is to turn a couple of votes and BAM. Mission accomplished.
So we best not hang our hats on the statute of limitations or jurisdiction. Trump has "ordered" an investigation so there will be one.
And I'm not even sure that a one week limit on the investigation is gonna fly. There are myriad ways the derps can play for time. Watch and see.
Keep in mind that [RR] expanded the scope of Mueller's investigation and he's still in office. Watch out for his shenanigans.
It will take some ballsy moves by the FBI to nip this in the bud. That's what I'm holding out hope for.
Bagster
It would be interesting to follow the money especially for the third accuser.
Since Fords lawyers are working pro bono, what does she need the money for? Maybe another front door...
Grassley was trustworthy, but stupid.
Ok, here’s one source.
This is not the source where I read it, but it describes the issues I remember reading about.
Kennedy did not leave the court under his terms per Q. Trump does not need a DS’er on the court to clean it out. He has already started to sweep it clean.
Thanks, I just caught that and replied.
“If Ford at one time had a license but it is now inactive, she would legally still be allowed to call herself a psychologist but forbidden from practicing psychology on patients until it was renewed. However, the database would have shown any past licenses granted to Ford, even if they were inactive.”
BWAHAHAHA!!!! and if she’s being PAID as a psychologist, there’s a problem, too!
I know the title she held with the abortion drug company was
“Chief Statistician”.. but her professorship should require a license, no??
Boogerticus
“....limited to current credible allegations ...”
And it’s been demonstrated that there aren’t any.
Good points Bagster, But this one week ‘investigation’ is limited to current allegations only. If the Dems try to bring more crazies to the table, they will be shown the door.
POTUS is comfortable with a one week delay.
I’m confident Judge K will be Justice K soon.
stars & stripes forever wrote:
“[current credible allegations against the nominee and must be completed no later than one week from today]
That leaves out new accusers.”
Good point about ‘no new accusers”.
(And there aren’t any “current credible allegations” either.)
“Also in the opening paragraph is this tidbit: Someone at Stanford University also appears to have caught the blunder and edited Fords faculty page.”
The article says in CA you are not ALLOWED to call yourself a psychologist unless you are licensed. Odd, but ..
video
Thomas Wictor statement on his account suspension by Twitter.
https://twitter.com/Debradelai/status/1045864072254763008
“LIBERAL LEFT LUNACY [BAIT].”
What do you think ‘bait’ means here?
No worries. I’m just catching up.
Please don’t abandon the thread, the welcome wagon can be wanting here but tough it out and join the party (bring your homies).
I agree. Perfectly said.
Lol calm down Yosemite Sam. I still in the fight but always question. How are you and Mom?
Just talking late at night... Baseball tickets seem to be his thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.